"The Sussmann trial has been just a tool for the Durham Team to introduce 'on the record' all that evidence and testimony."
That's not really how it works. You don't lay out your case in trial where that evidence is irrelevant. The Trump-Russia hoax theory was presented because that's the only place Durham had to put on that particula…
"The Sussmann trial has been just a tool for the Durham Team to introduce 'on the record' all that evidence and testimony."
That's not really how it works. You don't lay out your case in trial where that evidence is irrelevant. The Trump-Russia hoax theory was presented because that's the only place Durham had to put on that particular show.
The biggest problem with arguing against a Trump-Putin link is the Trump Tower meeting where Trump and his entire campaign fully expected to get info from Putin as "part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”
Great response. What you are saying is that this was a "show" trial, not in the Russian sense but as a performance where Durham gets to prance and fret his conspiracy theory without actually bringing any evidence at all. Kind of like the entire MAGA enterprise. Sounds great on forums but fails completely in courts, where facts matter.
"...without actually bringing any evidence at all..."
You have got to be kidding. Otherwise, you are being utterly obtuse.
And you also completely miss the entire successful point of the "MAGA enterprise." The courts have nothing to do with it. We finally (after 100 years of its slow corruption) have made, and continue to make, the Republican Party into a non-State-captured, pro-true-Capitalism home for the Classical Liberal, which is a return to its rightful, and righteous, place in the American political landscape.
What? What is "pro-true-Capitalism home for the Classical Liberal".
Trump is a conman from Queens. If I offered him a million $ and asked him to define "pro-true-Capitalism" he'd either laugh or, if he thought he could actually win, come up with some word-salad.
You would be delighted with that word-salad because you are also a moron.
M. Pat Kelly, I am sure, from your responses here (and sincerely thank you for the discussion) that you will disagree (and that's okay!) with my final addition today:
True Capitalism *is* Classical Liberalism, the true "liberalism," i.e. liberation from the State (not from need/want), as expressed so profoundly in the founding documents.
The problem is human nature. Without government control we would all be paying $100 a gallon for Exxon gasoline. Capitalist figured out really quickly that a monopoly was the best way to a profit. Competition requires government to act as a referee.
No, you are a communist because you think gov't is the only answer. The consumer is the "referee" and "free markets" can deal with "monopolies" far better than corrupt DIM gov'ts.
Tim, you handily won that debate. Of course, that is how it usually works when you use facts, and the other person only has commie propaganda. Anyone that believes gov't is the answer to "honest business" doesn't have a clue how we got in this economic debacle we are now suffering. You could have used the USSR as a great example how gov't can be a "referee", but like you said, it would likely be a wasted effort. Stay strong.
OK, well there's the emails stolen from the DNC and used by Trump on the trail, the "Russia find me the emails", taking Putin's word in Helsinki, destroying the records of his conversations with Putin....
On May 31 I wrote " The Trump-Russia hoax theory was presented because that's the only place Durham had to put on that particular show."
Yesterday Barr comes out and says exactly the same thing. Convictions were never the point, it was all about spinning out the fairy tale that there never was a Trump-Putin bromance.
And in fact Barr is right ... as long as you ignore the emails stolen by Russia from the DNC and used by Trump on the trail, the "Russia find me the emails", taking Putin's word in Helsinki, destroying the records of his conversations with Putin, saying the US was going to leave NATO, pushing the EU to re-admit Put to the G7.
You can trick yourself into ignoring all that but in the real world everyone knows Trump loves Putin.
The neocons have been exposed, and are a fading Statist fad. The uncapturable DJT has shown the way, and most Republican voters know this. The Tea Party was a valiant attempt, and its brief existence lives on in the hearts of the new Republican lay voter.
"The Sussmann trial has been just a tool for the Durham Team to introduce 'on the record' all that evidence and testimony."
That's not really how it works. You don't lay out your case in trial where that evidence is irrelevant. The Trump-Russia hoax theory was presented because that's the only place Durham had to put on that particular show.
The biggest problem with arguing against a Trump-Putin link is the Trump Tower meeting where Trump and his entire campaign fully expected to get info from Putin as "part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”
"That's not really how it works."
That is *exactly* how it works in the most important "court" of all: that of public opinion.
Great response. What you are saying is that this was a "show" trial, not in the Russian sense but as a performance where Durham gets to prance and fret his conspiracy theory without actually bringing any evidence at all. Kind of like the entire MAGA enterprise. Sounds great on forums but fails completely in courts, where facts matter.
"...without actually bringing any evidence at all..."
You have got to be kidding. Otherwise, you are being utterly obtuse.
And you also completely miss the entire successful point of the "MAGA enterprise." The courts have nothing to do with it. We finally (after 100 years of its slow corruption) have made, and continue to make, the Republican Party into a non-State-captured, pro-true-Capitalism home for the Classical Liberal, which is a return to its rightful, and righteous, place in the American political landscape.
What? What is "pro-true-Capitalism home for the Classical Liberal".
Trump is a conman from Queens. If I offered him a million $ and asked him to define "pro-true-Capitalism" he'd either laugh or, if he thought he could actually win, come up with some word-salad.
You would be delighted with that word-salad because you are also a moron.
You could not be more wrong.
M. Pat Kelly, I am sure, from your responses here (and sincerely thank you for the discussion) that you will disagree (and that's okay!) with my final addition today:
True Capitalism *is* Classical Liberalism, the true "liberalism," i.e. liberation from the State (not from need/want), as expressed so profoundly in the founding documents.
The two terms are exactly synonymous.
The problem is human nature. Without government control we would all be paying $100 a gallon for Exxon gasoline. Capitalist figured out really quickly that a monopoly was the best way to a profit. Competition requires government to act as a referee.
You sound like the perfect communist.
LOL. So I'm a communist because I'm against monopolies ? I suggest you acquaint yourself with the history of the Standard Oil Company
But Standard Oil was defeated with honest competition, as would your hilariously hyperbolic $100 per gallon gasoline.
You are a Communist because you believe there will always exist only one player, the State, in any market.
No, you are a communist because you think gov't is the only answer. The consumer is the "referee" and "free markets" can deal with "monopolies" far better than corrupt DIM gov'ts.
Again, you and I are of utterly opposite opinion. We aren't going to change each other's mind, I think, and I choose not to re-express mine here.
Tim, you handily won that debate. Of course, that is how it usually works when you use facts, and the other person only has commie propaganda. Anyone that believes gov't is the answer to "honest business" doesn't have a clue how we got in this economic debacle we are now suffering. You could have used the USSR as a great example how gov't can be a "referee", but like you said, it would likely be a wasted effort. Stay strong.
-->"a Trump-Putin link"? Arguing facts not in evidence. But go ahead, tell me "how it works."
OK, well there's the emails stolen from the DNC and used by Trump on the trail, the "Russia find me the emails", taking Putin's word in Helsinki, destroying the records of his conversations with Putin....
Good luck.
You too sir !
BS
You might try actually reading some of the transcripts from the trial so you don't sound so out-of-touch with reality.
Please, tell us all of your experience as a Federal prosecutor so we won't go on thinking you are watching way too much cnn.
On May 31 I wrote " The Trump-Russia hoax theory was presented because that's the only place Durham had to put on that particular show."
Yesterday Barr comes out and says exactly the same thing. Convictions were never the point, it was all about spinning out the fairy tale that there never was a Trump-Putin bromance.
And in fact Barr is right ... as long as you ignore the emails stolen by Russia from the DNC and used by Trump on the trail, the "Russia find me the emails", taking Putin's word in Helsinki, destroying the records of his conversations with Putin, saying the US was going to leave NATO, pushing the EU to re-admit Put to the G7.
You can trick yourself into ignoring all that but in the real world everyone knows Trump loves Putin.
I thought "Hitlery" was/is a sideshow, Gene. Are you schizo?
Now wait a minute, Gene; Bush fought to make all Iraqis free...right??? or have I got that wrong????...so confused...
So you say. So why do you keep commenting on HRC?
You people!
Gene, Gene, Gene: there are 2 (two) parties, and 2 (two) parties only. You can't defeat one without using the other.
There, now YOU aren't clueless anymore.
The neocons have been exposed, and are a fading Statist fad. The uncapturable DJT has shown the way, and most Republican voters know this. The Tea Party was a valiant attempt, and its brief existence lives on in the hearts of the new Republican lay voter.
Yea, but where does young Hunter and his whores come into play???...just asking