Totally disagree about the results. Pat yourself on the back all you like, but your negative review is wrong and not very helpful. Certainly, the judge and jury were compromised and too many have seen this for it to be ignored. However, I don't think for a second that Durham was surprised by this; more likely he expected it, maybe even w…
Totally disagree about the results. Pat yourself on the back all you like, but your negative review is wrong and not very helpful. Certainly, the judge and jury were compromised and too many have seen this for it to be ignored. However, I don't think for a second that Durham was surprised by this; more likely he expected it, maybe even wanted it to happen this way.
If this had been solely about lying to the fbi, it would not have taken over forty pages to write the indictment and Baker might have been the only witness, but now we know that hillary knew everything, the fbi lied REPEATEDLY, and President Trump is and always has been innocent.
There was a great deal of UNKNOWN information released in this trial and though you are so ready to let hillary escape, I have no reason to believe that Durham does. They went to a great deal of effort to expose hillary, joffe, and a number of fbi thugs. I don't think for a second that Durham wants his career to end as "another hillary flunky".
Kash Patel has been the "guiding light of truth" in all of this. His experience and accomplishments are priceless in evaluating this situation. Under normal circumstances (outside of D.C.), I believe the verdict would have been different and I would bet you a sawbuck that Kash is not totally surprised.
Perhaps you did not know that the judge is corrupt and there were jurors that were hillary loyalists. There would be little reason to think corruption was not a possibility given the location. I believe Durham was well aware of who was in the courtroom and why he wrote such a long indictment paper.
Totally disagree about the results. Pat yourself on the back all you like, but your negative review is wrong and not very helpful. Certainly, the judge and jury were compromised and too many have seen this for it to be ignored. However, I don't think for a second that Durham was surprised by this; more likely he expected it, maybe even wanted it to happen this way.
If this had been solely about lying to the fbi, it would not have taken over forty pages to write the indictment and Baker might have been the only witness, but now we know that hillary knew everything, the fbi lied REPEATEDLY, and President Trump is and always has been innocent.
There was a great deal of UNKNOWN information released in this trial and though you are so ready to let hillary escape, I have no reason to believe that Durham does. They went to a great deal of effort to expose hillary, joffe, and a number of fbi thugs. I don't think for a second that Durham wants his career to end as "another hillary flunky".
Kash Patel expected conviction because this was not he said she said. It contained clear documentation of his lies.
Kash Patel has been the "guiding light of truth" in all of this. His experience and accomplishments are priceless in evaluating this situation. Under normal circumstances (outside of D.C.), I believe the verdict would have been different and I would bet you a sawbuck that Kash is not totally surprised.
OK, I get it now. You're writing parody, right?
Oh, I get it now, you are an idiot commie that would do better writing for the Babylon Bee.
Honey, you get absolutely nothing. You drank the MAGA KoolAid.
You are one pitiful POS....and as I have told you before, your factless opinions mean nothing to me.
I think that is partially true.
Surely this was an opportunity to blow the lid on much that was unproven and/or ambiguous, which Durham did.
I don't think he expected a loss, or that losing this was in his plans.
Perhaps you did not know that the judge is corrupt and there were jurors that were hillary loyalists. There would be little reason to think corruption was not a possibility given the location. I believe Durham was well aware of who was in the courtroom and why he wrote such a long indictment paper.