Thanks once again Techno for covering all the bases related to this selection. While I don't follow Dem politics, I watched Walz's "neighborly values" interview last week and thought he'd be the selection. He pushes the progressive values across via the Wilfred Brimley folksy manner that makes them appear "nice". I've thought that Kamala…
Thanks once again Techno for covering all the bases related to this selection. While I don't follow Dem politics, I watched Walz's "neighborly values" interview last week and thought he'd be the selection. He pushes the progressive values across via the Wilfred Brimley folksy manner that makes them appear "nice". I've thought that Kamala is probably losing (baby) boomer support which is critical for a good turn-out and it's my opinion that's what Walz is for.
I could be wrong but I think the polling has been and will be wrong until the election. As has been their want for the last decade, the media is ignoring how bad the economy is. If you're living in the poor or middle class, it's been this way since Covid and it's only gotten worse. If you're living in the upper class, you don't see it. Media lives there as do most professional pundits. Kamala is too tied to the country's current circumstances to win. Trump might be divisive but at the end of the day, people will vote for their economic health.
I think they placed Kamala into this position with Walz so that the Dem base will at least vote. Shapiro would have peeled away some of the base. They need robust participation or they're going to lose the down ballot races. In my humble estimation, that's why it's Kamala (not Joe) and Walz.
Remember, this is a Hussein and deep state move, by an illegitimate admin that committed treason by stealing the election. They are liars, and hate America.
Thanks once again Techno for covering all the bases related to this selection. While I don't follow Dem politics, I watched Walz's "neighborly values" interview last week and thought he'd be the selection. He pushes the progressive values across via the Wilfred Brimley folksy manner that makes them appear "nice". I've thought that Kamala is probably losing (baby) boomer support which is critical for a good turn-out and it's my opinion that's what Walz is for.
I could be wrong but I think the polling has been and will be wrong until the election. As has been their want for the last decade, the media is ignoring how bad the economy is. If you're living in the poor or middle class, it's been this way since Covid and it's only gotten worse. If you're living in the upper class, you don't see it. Media lives there as do most professional pundits. Kamala is too tied to the country's current circumstances to win. Trump might be divisive but at the end of the day, people will vote for their economic health.
I think they placed Kamala into this position with Walz so that the Dem base will at least vote. Shapiro would have peeled away some of the base. They need robust participation or they're going to lose the down ballot races. In my humble estimation, that's why it's Kamala (not Joe) and Walz.
Remember, this is a Hussein and deep state move, by an illegitimate admin that committed treason by stealing the election. They are liars, and hate America.