I'm the last person to rely on the "deeply sourced and relentless" pee-tape hoaxers at the NY Times. But recently they seem to have some decent sourcing on what's going on inside the Durham Investigation. (Ex. They reported Durham was seeking to indict Sussmann, and the next day he got indicted.)
They've been more accurate recently about what's happening with Durham than John Solomon ever was.
I'm the last person to rely on the "deeply sourced and relentless" pee-tape hoaxers at the NY Times. But recently they seem to have some decent sourcing on what's going on inside the Durham Investigation. (Ex. They reported Durham was seeking to indict Sussmann, and the next day he got indicted.)
They've been more accurate recently about what's happening with Durham than John Solomon ever was.
A brilliant military officer .. once said to me: YA GOTTA TRY.. that was back in the day when we had brilliant military officers and other "intelligence agencies" with character and moral fortitude.. and let me be old fashioned here: when Men were Men.. :) and I liked it that way.. I think of what my sons face all the time.. THANKS.. keep it up
I mean the only reason that Biden & Garland wouldn't have fired Durham by now is fear of the political blowback it would cause.
Is there anything you've seen from Merrick Garland's DOJ that leads you to believe political blowback is even a consideration over there? The only reason they would keep him around is because they know it's not going to amount to anything of real consequence.
Exactly. No good pos they are. I really think that if Durham would indict McCabe that would lead to brennan then to Biden and Obama. They can't have that.
I'm the last person to rely on the "deeply sourced and relentless" pee-tape hoaxers at the NY Times. But recently they seem to have some decent sourcing on what's going on inside the Durham Investigation. (Ex. They reported Durham was seeking to indict Sussmann, and the next day he got indicted.)
They've been more accurate recently about what's happening with Durham than John Solomon ever was.
A brilliant military officer .. once said to me: YA GOTTA TRY.. that was back in the day when we had brilliant military officers and other "intelligence agencies" with character and moral fortitude.. and let me be old fashioned here: when Men were Men.. :) and I liked it that way.. I think of what my sons face all the time.. THANKS.. keep it up
So the NY slimes got the playbook? Probably some intel plant working at the slimes has the worksheet. Smh
I mean the only reason that Biden & Garland wouldn't have fired Durham by now is fear of the political blowback it would cause.
Is there anything you've seen from Merrick Garland's DOJ that leads you to believe political blowback is even a consideration over there? The only reason they would keep him around is because they know it's not going to amount to anything of real consequence.
Exactly. No good pos they are. I really think that if Durham would indict McCabe that would lead to brennan then to Biden and Obama. They can't have that.
I have been using that word a lot lately: Slime.. hmm .. have an early night.. still need to catch up on rest.. :) thx