129 Comments

William Binney, fmr NSA Technical Director, explained many times that the so-called "DNC Hack" was an Inside Job, a Leak, not a Hack, because the data transfer rate was way too high for internet connections: the DNC data transfer had to be done by someone inside the DNC HQ, plugging a hard drive (or other data storage tool) in the DNC server. (Seth Rich?)

Russia had nothing to do with the DNC data leak: that was another bogus claim of the DemocRats, just like the bogus Alfa Bank claim. Whether Joffe and Sussmann were involved in originating and peddling the fake narrative "It's a DNC Russian Hack" ... well, it's possible.

What is certain is that the Durham Team is opening a gigantic Can of Worms.

Expand full comment

2) it looks like the Sussmann defense is (unwittingly) helping the Durham Team in building a gigantic Criminal Conspiracy case. We have already seen that with Robby Mook: it was the defense who called Mook to testify... and we know what happened in the redirect... "it was Hillary Clinton who greenlighted the AlfaBank Hoax to the media"

The Sussmann defense is (unwittingly?) (or wittingly?) helping the Durham Team?

* * *

TechnoFog, I have written an article on my Substack, and I would like you to read it and give me your opinion about it. This is the link: https://gregrubini.substack.com/p/durham-sussmann-trial-01

My idea (in the linked article) is that the MAIN goal of the Durham Team not just winning a conviction of Sussmann: the Durham Team is using the Sussmann trial to introduce evidence (and witness testimony) on record, to lay out the framework of a broad “Criminal Conspiracy”.

The evidence and the witnesses testimony presented by the Durham Team is “overkill” to just indict Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI.

Expand full comment

"it looks like the Sussmann defense is (unwittingly) helping the Durham Team in building a gigantic Criminal Conspiracy case"

Do we dare to dream?

Expand full comment

Well, Pamela, you've read my article, and the picture which emerges from the transcripts and evidence is exactly that - isn't it?

Expand full comment

Indeed it is but if evidence or justice held weight in Washington we would live in a far different world where Assange was free and war criminals jailed.

Expand full comment

you're right!

I've been VERY disappointed that Trump didn't pardon Julian Assange and Edward Snowden: he should have pardoned both of them on January 21st, 2017.

And, by the way: Trump should have exited the US from NATO and from the UN during his first 90 days of Presidency, in 2017, as well.

Expand full comment

I watched The Grugq and pwnallthethings beclown themselves on Twitter "analysing" the Guccifer 2.0 garbage and concluding it was opened and edited on a Russian-language computer. I thought what motive would Russia have to do that; they have tools that would not leave a forensic trace. Tried to warn Grugq and Pwn but they wouldn't listen. Six months later WikiLeaks hung out Marble Framework and Umbrage in the Vault7 release, which explained the planted Russian "signatures". The media had used Grugq's interview then circle jerk quoted each others' stories while incorrectly conflating Guccifer 2.0 and DC Leaks website with the DNCLeaks and PodestaEmails leaks and WikiLeaks. That was how a lot of that got moving in the media. It was an obvious frame job but yet two of Twitter's most well-loved "security experts" took the bait. Our world is retarded.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

One of the most irritating failures of Trump was his consistent and spectacularly inept personnel choices. He recently blamed this on taking advice from a bunch of RINO's but he really should have known better. I believe the relevant slogan is "Personnel is Policy".

Expand full comment

Normal Americans have no idea how corrupt DC is, Trump included. Now that he sees, He may get that swamp drained in his 3rd term. Those of us who understand the evil, pray daily for the absolute destruction of DC and the media.

Expand full comment

I believe to use the term properly in the James Clapper sense, it would be "not wittingly." Admittedly one might quibble that the phraseology is only appropriate for Congressional testimony.

Expand full comment

How sure are we that mann is not suss; not a decoy or a patsy?

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

really?, this adds somehow to the adult conversation...

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

you could have just said "There is no crime in lying to the media…" the rest doesn't add anything.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Not only is it not a crime but is it even unethical to lie to professional propagandists, narrative engineers and gas lighters?

Expand full comment

Show proof irrefutable proof.

Expand full comment

Show proof, indisputable proof, the he did.

Expand full comment

from the VIPS letter:

"Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying was performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see here and here].

Independent analyst Skip Folden, who retired after 25 years as the IBM Program Manager for Information Technology, US, who examined the recent forensic findings, is a co-author of this Memorandum. He has drafted a more detailed technical report titled “Cyber-Forensic Investigation of ‘Russian Hack’ and Missing Intelligence Community Disclaimers,” and sent it to the offices of the Special Counsel and the Attorney General. VIPS member William Binney, a former Technical Director at the National Security Agency, and other senior NSA “alumni” in VIPS attest to the professionalism of the independent forensic findings.

The recent forensic studies fill in a critical gap. Why the FBI neglected to perform any independent forensics on the original “Guccifer 2.0” material remains a mystery – as does the lack of any sign that the “hand-picked analysts” from the FBI, CIA, and NSA, who wrote the “Intelligence Community Assessment” dated January 6, 2017, gave any attention to forensics."

and the link for the second "here" first one is gone...

https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/

Expand full comment

yep, exactly that!

I recall reading that VIPS (William Binney) Analysis back in 2019 (or 2018).

I recall trolling fmr Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein on his Twitter page on that, around July 2019 (probably I still have the screenshot, somewhere in my files). - I was walking right in front of the DOJ building at 950, Pennsylvania Avenue on April 29, 2019, at 5:30 pm, in the exact moment when Rod Rosenstein resigned.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment
May 26, 2022·edited May 26, 2022

At the time, it seemed like Trump was just not savvy as a “politician” and kept appointing people who later betrayed him. I believe that Trump was asked to run, asked to play a specific role by, Clif High calls it the Self Organizing Collective (SOC) which would include the Q team - and in hindsight all those players Trump drew in and got exposed for being DeepState traitors makes me marvel at his political savvy. I think Trump speaks to mainstream America, those people whose perceptions are mostly formed by the “nightly news”…and he woke a heck of a lot of them up!

I pay attention to people like technofog because of Q and the smarter than me anons who did the deep dives down so many rabbit holes.

I don’t think Trump’s choices or his words are ever a mistake. He is a top General in The Art of War…

And here we are, the incredibly tangled web of lies and deception is unraveling on ever deeper layers

Expand full comment

Have to agree on that but hindsight you know is 20/20. One must remember that Trump was a NY guy, not a DC guy.

Expand full comment

agree... he mistakenly thought these guys were on his side... even the former GO's screwed him...

Expand full comment

Pretty sure it's all here.. love & adore Adam Carter's work! https://g-2.space/#1

Expand full comment

Thanks... alot to read.

Expand full comment

Would this be when Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was the head of the DNC? Would the inside hack be related to the Awan brothers who were hired by Wasserman-Schultz to provide IT services for the DNC?

Expand full comment

In addition to Binney's technical analysis we had Wikileaks publisher Julian Assange state their source was not a State actor. FBI never spoke to Julian Assange or anyone at WikiLeaks because truth tellers always screw up a great propaganda operation.

Fun flashback - New Yorker's Russian hacking includes Gucifer 2.0 nonsense

(Adam Carter is the unrivaled source debunking that psyop. https://g-2.space/#1 )

New Yorker July 2018

"When did Russian intelligence give WikiLeaks the e-mails that it hacked from the Democratic National Committee and John Podesta, and how did it transmit them? Shortly after the election, James Clapper, then the director of National Intelligence, testified before Congress that American intelligence officials could not clearly pinpoint these facts. “We don’t have good insight into the sequencing of the releases, or when the data may have been provided,” he said. Today, almost two years later, and after months of investigation, we know a lot more than we once did. But our insight into the timing—at least, from publicly available information—remains uncertain."

https://web.archive.org/web/20180724151742/https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-the-latest-mueller-indictment-reveals-about-wikileaks-ties-to-russia-and-what-it-doesnt

Expand full comment

Lot of people in that can.

Expand full comment

"people"?? LOL... you certainly meant "lots of worms in that can"...

but yeah, lots of worms: probably around 70 or 80 (if not more)

Expand full comment

I'm guessing Assange has been interrogated by Durham and co. Let's not forget about Seth Rich.

Expand full comment

No that did not happen. Julian Assange has never been questioned by DoJ even though he did offer to provide testimony relating to the leak.

Expand full comment

What is certain is that the Durham Team is opening a gigantic can of distractions.

Expand full comment

will they turn the can over or put the lid back on?

Expand full comment

the latter....

Expand full comment

Well said

Expand full comment

The black pill dealer Mr Binney . A total ass wipe who owned millions of you. Russians did penetrate the DNC/DCCC .. And the IG stated that fact and added 3 weeks later the data was EX-FILTRATED and never once said the Russians did the ex-filtration. Ya all need to wake up. Hillary's top guy was a Russian Paid contractor. Simpson and Steele were as well. And not once do any of you stop and consider. DID HILLARY'S People use the known infiltration. To pick and remove the data they desired and blame it on the Russians. Who factually had penitrated the server. Instead you ass hats think the FBI and C/S lied to help Hillary.. FFS people wake up .. Think OUT of the black pill dealers box .. "There all in on it" to help Hillary win. Yet none of ya realize COMEY who reopened the Hillary email case. Caused her to lose and was under investigation for the HATCH Act immediately after he did it. Demanded by Democrats !! READ the documents yourself folks. Stop letting others think for you

Expand full comment

Bill Binney was Chief Technical Director for NSA until he turned whistleblower exposing Patriot Act unconstitutional spying on Americans. His technical assessment of data transfer rates for the exfiltrated files far outweighs our lying "intelligence" cabal and certainly mud slinging random nobody.

"And not once do any of you stop and consider. DID HILLARY'S People use the known infiltration. To pick and remove the data they desired and blame it on the Russians."

They are email spools that document Hillary campaign cheating Bernie out of the nomination and financial fraud in such detail DWS and others resigned. To make your theory work Clinton campaign would need to leak redacted set of emails and leak them. It makes no sense. Hacking accusation was damage control.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/

"FFS people wake up .. Think OUT of the black pill dealers box .. "There all in on it" to help Hillary win. Yet none of ya realize COMEY who reopened the Hillary email case. Caused her to lose and was under investigation for the HATCH Act immediately after he did it. Demanded by Democrats !! READ the documents yourself folks. Stop letting others think for you"

Take your own advice and read the evidence you are the one who has been fooled. Follow the Sussman trial there is no doubt the FBI and Clinton campaign engaged in a conspiracy together and fromhere it looks a lot like treason against a democratically elected President.

https://technofog.substack.com/p/was-rodney-joffe-involved-in-the?s=r

Expand full comment

My recollection is Comey reopened the Hillary investigation to stop it from blowing up in their faces and, if he had cleared her a couple of days sooner, it would have stopped the bleeding. But, they waited a couple days too long and it was too late.

Expand full comment

Great memory!

Vanity Fair 2017 ~

For original sin, you have to start with Hillary Clinton, who began using a private e-mail account tied to a server in the basement of her and Bill’s Chappaqua house in 2009, when she was Obama’s secretary of state.

In early July 2015, after reporters and congressional investigators looking into the 2012 attacks in Benghazi filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests but came up empty on Clinton’s e-mails, the inspector general of the intelligence community notified the F.B.I. of a potential compromise of classified information. This sort of security review isn’t uncommon—one source says that hundreds of such cases are referred every year—and the very notion of what’s classified is contentious in and of itself, with many arguing that the U.S. government has a huge over-classification problem. A former U.S. attorney observes, “[The classification system] is a huge cloud. Who classifies what? Who has a right to classify? Everyone is sloppy.”

But the probe into Clinton’s server quickly escalated, as reports appeared that she had deleted up to 30,000 e-mails that she considered personal. After an initial review of the matter, the F.B.I. opened a criminal investigation.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170223111957/https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/02/james-comey-fbi-director-letter

Expand full comment

and where do we go for your deep analysis of the event? Not sure how the IG determined that; which he actually did not. We have never been told how they know it was anything aside from the indictments that have no evidence besides "trust us" ... if anything this trial demonstrated the malfeasance within the leadership of the FBI and the other agencies, 7th floor and all. On the other hand the VIPS people have published their analysis and conclusions. What the VIPS analysis showed was that the data was accessed locally and not via internet, not who actually downloaded the data.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

The DNC network intrusion topic is complicated by the fact that according to Shawn Henry, president of CrowdStrike Services, who testified to the House Intel Committee, on either April 30 or May 1 2016, when Sussmann first contacted him, Sussmann told him that he had learned that the FBI had contacted the DNC's IT subcontractor months prior about some network traffic or circumstances that the FBI observed, advising the IT contractor to do a full investigation of their IT network. Further, the specific term that Sussmann repeated was a specific reference to the Russian Government. I have a recollection of reading at the time that the FBI had contacted a number of organizations about the same time. While this wasn't specifically concerning the purloined emails, but it planted the seed, and, speculating, could have inspired thesubsequent claims about Russians.

Expand full comment

Chafetz was right. In fact everyone everywhere was listening to State Department traffic on her home made server. It was unencrypted and even Obama communicated over it under a pseudonym. Other leaks have said that there were twelve Chinese assets that disappeared because of their malfeasance. None the less, that server was shut down before the elections. So far this investigation isn't about Hillary's emails. It's about spying on Donald Trump and trying to blame it on the Russians. Like I said you're conflating and obfuscating evidently.

Expand full comment

You're conflating two different servers. The DNC server was not Hillary's private State Dept. server.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

When was this speculation?

Expand full comment

Just ‘WOW’

Weaponised governmental agencies unequivocally using their positions to abuse power and revoke our Constitutional provisions!

Thank You Techno Fog!

Expand full comment

you said it.

Expand full comment

🙏🛐

Expand full comment

And also with you! :) thx. prayer is good !

Expand full comment

Durham has given us a “talking indictment” leading to a “bullhorn trial.”

Anyone paying attention can see plain evidence of the Obama Administration conspiring with the Clinton Campaign and Democrat Party (DNC) attempting to steal the 2016 election. This is facilitated by the senior political appointees at the FBI and DOJ lending credibility to the multiple hoaxes by agglomerating all of the bogus lines of “investigation” into a fraudulent narrative around Trump, his campaign and his transition being “in Putin’s pocket” or “colluding with Russia.” Trump, Page, Pappadopoulous, Stone, Flynn… all were falsely targeted.

This harks back to McCarthy’s using fear of the big Red Threat to impinge the civil liberties and threaten the democratic processes of our country in the 50s. Back then, However, many of McCarthy’s targets WERE Communists/sympathizers. NO ONE in the current version is a Russia supporter - quite the opposite.

Durham has left nothing to the imagination. Everything is impeccably documented and evidenced. Hillary was at the heart of the plot, and Sullivan orchestrated it. They expected the FBI to undermine Trump’s campaign and waltz into the third term of Obama’s presidency. But the need to cover up Hillary’s own REAL scandals subverted their plan. Weiner’s laptop brought her whole mess back into the public eye, and required Comey’s infamous re-opening and absurdist re-closing of that investigation.

Imagine if Trump had come into the White House unsullied by the ridiculous FBI investigations, and with no Special Counsel to deal with. Hillary’s email issues and the Foundation investigations still open. Comey replaced wth a non-partisan Director and Sessions not recused as AG. An objective investigation would have led to a Special Counsel to examine Hillary’s server, the foundation’s abject corruption, the Clinton profiteering, Uranium One. That would have expanded into the Biden family’s buinesses in Ukraine and China, and a parade of top Democrat indictments trials an convictions.

The Democrat Party would be in shambles, and a majority GOP in the House and Senate would have empowered Trump’s agenda, and the economy, the border, and even our response to COVID would all have been handled and controlled properly. Russia would have remained in the box Trump built for them, and China on the defensive. There would have been no invasion of Ukraine, and inflation would still be tame, with rates rising naturally as the strong economy absorbed and handled the higher cost of funding without skyrocketing energy prices, as US production contnued to increase every year.

Yeah — this trial is about a whole lot more than just Sussman’s lie. And this is why the liberal media is pretending it isn’t even happening.

Expand full comment

What if? What if? We've been saying that for many years.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment
May 25, 2022·edited May 25, 2022

All three of them united in selling out their offices to stop Trump. They were quite happy and secure in their prefecture under Obama. I met Priestap in a small group lunch for senior private sector Security professionals in early 2017, and his hatred of Trump was palpable. The senior FBI crew had a very perverted view of Trump’s personality and beliefs, exacerbated by the garbage being fed to them by Obama’s staff who, quite obviously had every reason to hate Trump. These are not things I am guessing at. I am a part of the NYC real estate world, and know the Trumps quite well.

Even assuming your characterizations of their politics are correct, they are not inconsistent with their hatred of Trump and their abiding loyalty to the “Deep State” and the administrative hive that feeds off the body politic.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

G.H.W.B. was a pro one world government supporter. He said so in his speeches. The Bushes are back stabbing GOP RINOS. The Trump hating GOP put their full support behind Jeb Bush to win the republican nomination in 2016. The GOP joined the democrats to relentlessly attack then candidate Trump.

Obama, his administration and the corporate MSM relentlessly blamed G.W. Jr. for everything that they felt is wrong with this country right up until Obama finally walked out of the White House.

For the establishment GOP to back Jeb Bush after the Bush name was positioned as being the enemy by Obama it was either insanity to choose Jeb to support or they GOP were complicit in handing the election to Hillary.

Expand full comment

I think that’s a fair characterization. The hatred of Trump runs deep in people who consider themselves of a better class than him - his vulgarity and crassness is offensive. As someone who admires what Trump tried to do, I am equally frustrated by his stubborn refusal to adopt even the slightest reconciliatory tone - it might have kept the 2020 election somewhat honest and saved the country and the world from this present unmitigated disaster.

Expand full comment

Why should Trump have reconciled with the communist democrats and the back stabbing GOP RINOS? He knew months ahead of the election that the democrats were knee deep in institutionalized election rigging. That’s why he said the idea of mail in ballots was a recipe for corruption. The movie “2000 Mules” confirms that Trump was right.

Expand full comment

Did you know that Comey’s brother, Peter handled the Clintons taxes and filings?

Expand full comment

Pretty sure they hate Trump more, actions speaking louder than words... and a bush Republican is what? What exact form of Republican would that be?

Expand full comment

A Bush republican is, first and foremost, not a conservative republican. They support the establishment GOP RINOs.

Expand full comment
May 26, 2022Liked by Techno Fog

Anyone familiar with criminal investigations knows that a heavily redacted report created by a third party (Crowdstrike) and edited by a law office (Perkins Coie) BEFORE it reached the FBI regarding a supposed crime where the actual evidence is not available to the investigation....will not hold up in any court in the US.

No chain of custody. No opportunity for the defense to examine the evidence. No oath attested as to the veracity of the evidence can be mad by an law enforcement officer to a court.

This whole investigation was a farce from the beginning.

Expand full comment
May 26, 2022Liked by Techno Fog

One small nit, Pittsburgh has a H at the end. Otherwise, great read.

Expand full comment

Consider something else. What if Crowdstrike was a patsy, there to unknowingly reach false conclusions of a “Russian hack” based on information provided to them, in part, by Rodney Joffe?.....Did Crowdstrike have Hillary as one of there speakers at an event in DC?

Expand full comment
May 25, 2022·edited May 25, 2022

Concerning the subject, you may want to read the redacted testimony of Shawn Henry, President of CrowdStrike Services dated December 5, 2017. Please note, CrowdStrike Services is a legal subsidiary of CrowdStrike that provides security professionals that do analysis and remediation. The parent company provides security software. Often Henry is depicted as "CEO" or "owner" or "head" or "founder" of CrowdStrike. He is none of those things.

Sussmann contacted Henry on April 30, 2016, and either then or the day after told Henry that some months prior, the FBI had contacted the DNC security IT subcontractor to inform them that they had seen unusual traffic or activity, and that somebody should do a full examination of the DNC IT environment. Further, Sussmann repeated a specific term that the FBI had used that according to Henry, "they used a term that I know is related to the Russian Government"

Expand full comment

What 'term'?

Expand full comment

The specific term in the transcript is "Dukes", but there is a lot of discussion in the Shawn Henry testimony, that provides context and nuance, so I would encourage you to read it for yourself. A number of people testified, and the transcripts are available here: https://intelligence.house.gov/russiainvestigation/

Expand full comment

I just read that again and the name Joffe rings a bell.. and I remember doing research on the butterfly bot net: as did all the rest of the computer geeks: this is really amazing work; and Roger Stone.. we are getting into the heart of this case. waiting.. thx. Techno..

Expand full comment

These CHS (paid informants) might be another part of the FBI's illegal activities. Congress should demand number from the FBI that states exactly how many informants the FBI is paying. EVERY case seems to have an informant popping up like mushrooms after a rainstorm.

It is possible that the U.S. is honeycombed with paid informants. Believe me they probably number in the 10's of thousands or more. Just how many citizens are tasked with spying on their fellow Americans and WHY!

This is East German level of domestic spying. Appears that CHS's are everywhere and salted within Academia, Tech companies, business corporations and within every nook and cranny of American life. Might be nice to know the budget for these FBI spies. This surveillance State has been going on for decades without anyone ever checking the extent of this information network. Much of this spying is not about actual criminal activity. Wish Congress could stop their constant bickering and finally expose the FBI's on going violations of every Americans civil rights by their taxpayer supported internal spying by CHS's.

Expand full comment

@Techno Fog,

To me it's not a far stretch to imagine Mr Joffe being involved in the DNC 'hack' cover-up. Considering Mr Joffe's involvement in the Alfa Bank hoax with Georgia Tech and Mr Sussman. Mr Sussman involved in the DNC 'hack' and CrowdStrike. Mr Shawn Henry of CrowdStrike (formerly of FBI cyber crimes) is an alumni of Georgia Tech.

It's all circular and inbred.

Mr Joffe and Mr Henry are DNS experts. DNS is considered the "Plumbing of the internet".

When you have a Plumbing problem who do you call?

Expert plumbers.

Expand full comment

It seems Joffe and what ever Georgia Tech contributed was their reputation not actual findings by peddling a lie.

Expand full comment

Techno_Fog?

I know the narrative exists that Joffe is a biased hack but man you’ve made some leaps in this article.

If you are going to tie him in to so many things, why haven’t you watched this video and made those connections as well?

https://www.c-span.org/video/?285640-1/cyber-security

Expand full comment
author

No leaps, just questions about the extent of his involvement in Russia-related issues. If there is a leap to make, it’s that Joffe’s deception with respect to Alfa Bank might not have been his first effort to pull one over on the government.

Expand full comment

What if he isn’t a political hack? It’s certainly possible he has some pretty incredible information that nobody really wants out in the public.

Expand full comment

Are you familiar with Joffe's fraudulent past? Being a political hack would be a step UP for a fraud like Joffe. What he was doing working with the FBI tells you all you need to know about the FBI:

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2022/02/17/the_checkered_past_of_the_fbi_computer_contractor_who_spied_on_trump_816761.html

Expand full comment

Go before 2017 or just tell people the narrative. I’m the last person you should question about Joffe’s history.

Expand full comment

I’ve spent more time investigating Joffe than most people spend at a full time job for six months.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Hellman told us a lie and the truth in one comment.

“5150ish” is true but it’s also false.

5150 a person in crisis? Real code but not what he REALLY meant.

Hellman is a DNS guy. He knows RFC 5150 better than a welfare code.

Ever heard this: “It’s going to be biblical”?

Go find the “Internet Bible”

Expand full comment

I mean, Joffe is the leader of “The Cabal”!

Maybe it’s the same Cabal that Trump said surrounds Biden!

;)

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

IMHO it was the bridge until they could introduce the Steele material and also explains why the Dossier made its way to the FBI thru so many channels... State, McCain, Fusion GPS, the Ohr's off the top of my head... the FBI opening a full investigation over hearsay that was found to be inaccurate within days still boggles my mind, using the FFG (Downer) as the excuse as if since it came from an Ambassador it must be accurate... even Downer says they got it wrong.

Expand full comment

https://www.c-span.org/person/?1005807/RodneyJoffe yep thanks I really appreciate that link.. sent it someone who has more time than I do.. and better eyes.. to review.. thx.

Expand full comment

I see.. you can find Joffe on the clips.. going to listen to it; and also Neustar.. sounds familiar..will listen for while to Joffe.

Expand full comment

If you don’t listen to the entire hearing, you won’t be completely informed…

Pay attention to who is the chairman of the committee…

Expand full comment

I am looking at it now.. it is two hours.. and I will have to search the mark in the Cspan clip.. I found the botnet butterfly if that is in here another way because I do keep track of massive attacks.. looking now.

Expand full comment

no kidding: I have other things that I have to do, but I came back again: IT gives me chills. reads like a spy thriller.. wow.. and sort of scary... but you are reporting what is in the trial.. will look at that video right now.

Expand full comment

Did you see anything?

Expand full comment

There is no such thing as the "democratic" party. It's democrat party.

Expand full comment

Exactly. Ignore the attempt to rebrand the party of slavery and Jim Crowe.

Expand full comment

Great Job

Expand full comment

This all comes back to them thinking Hillary couldn't lose so they obeyed Obama and tried to meddle in the election. After Trump won they had to go scorched earth or allow Sessions to find them out.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Obama was a homosexual in high school, everything he does is about politics, he's a clown show, he was told by the CIA boss (Brenan) that the Russia stuff was a dirty political trick by Hillary and co. but did he tell us that? No the clown allowed this country to be divided for 4 years. He is a clown.

Expand full comment

I am still suspicious that the so-called Russian hack of the DNC server was also a hoax. Was Joffe the real hacker?

Expand full comment

It was a hoax, everything was a hoax.

Expand full comment

Crowdstrike a Ukrainian operator against Russia

https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/03/crowdstrike-revises-russian-hack-into-ukrainian-artillery/

We’re all getting played by Victoria Nuland and Vindman and Ciaramella and slow Joe and Crackhead

Expand full comment

"Grasso explained that these omissions were material because the motivation of a source’s political agenda is relevant to the type of cases they 'can open.'" ~ A witness for the defense you say? Cross examination sure disarmed him in short order.

Expand full comment