58 Comments

Wow great research. Something the mainstream media would never do.

Expand full comment

When the Rule of Law in this country used to work, under the ethic rules a Judge who had the appearance of a conflict of interest would rescues themself from the case. Today judicial ethics no longer applies. Here you have a Judge who has major conflicts yet she is still allowed to be the trial judge. Her rulings to date show how rigged the system is in setting up a conviction of a former President in a town controlled by the democrats. I bet this Judge will denied the motions of venue change etc so Trump can be tried and convicted before the election. This illustrates why we no longer have a fair justice system where the court system has evolved into show me the man I will show you the crime is now the new theme of the day. Americans better wake up an realize if they can do this to a former President what do you think they will do to you if they win in 2024. The mere fact the FBI and other agencies are being used to get you to comply with there radical agenda of going after their citizens free speech, gun and assembly rights should be the wake up that your in a burning building and if you don’t act to get out will perish. Remember this in Nov 2024 as you have the power to change this.

Expand full comment

Her professional history, rulings, and the law firm she came from, suggest she’s more corrupt than the Biden family.

Expand full comment

Until something is done about these Communists trying to run our Country into the ground, the same

scenarios will continue. The National Debt clock can keep on running into oblivion, because that money will never be paid back. JOEBAMA is printing money faster than he can promise it out.

Expand full comment

This is a quintessential example of election interference as there ever has been!

Expand full comment

Tanya Chutkan, is THE gatekeeper positioned to serve as a guardrail against what evidence is admitted into court to become a part of the public record.

The jury can’t contemplate something a judge never permits it to see. IMHO this is just the beginning.

Expand full comment

I don’t deal in what ifs if they win them there no way to stop them from consolidating their power of using the state to impose their ideology on the country. If we lose country over it. If we win then they will be the ones to take to the streets using violence to burn down the system exposing them that this was never about democracy but retaining power however Trump will have the power of the state to stop the nonsense. The left know if they lose everything they done will get exposed and all their efforts to destroy the country fails. this election is the tipping point for the country, the choices couldn’t be clearer you want to restore the Rule of Law and sanity you vote them out of office and demand accountability if want to become a banana republic and like the lefts agenda you vote for them. There is no plan B only plan A vote them out of power.

Expand full comment

Not very good strategy to flaunt their bias big time kudos & thanks for perfectly sourced evidence. It's galling so much politically driven lawfare is waged in plain sight so brazenly.

The asymmetry between treatment of insiders & outsiders is jammed in our faces while presstitutes do their best to contort and bury facts, paint themselves as heroes & Assange an info terrorist

Expand full comment

They are going to rig this to send him to jail while everyone stares at it - these folks don’t care about appearances, they will burn down the entire house while locked inside it

Expand full comment

I'm not a fan of Trump, but this is ridiculous. And it does nothing but harden perceptions that this is just a political witchhunt.

Expand full comment

There is a strong 1st Amendment argument that this case should have never been brought. It is clear that the "Resistance" is going to get their pound of flesh from Trump come hell or high water. If (when) he is convicted in this case, he will appeal so she has no incentive to be objective now. Eventually Trump will have to pursue an appeal to the USSC, with the attendant time, effort and expense.

Expand full comment

I think those infected with TDS truly believe their moral standard trumps (Pun intended) everyone else’s, especially in DC where it’s the echo chamber of all echo chambers. “Constitution be damned, I’m doing it for democracy!”

Expand full comment

This is a bad case for any judge's career. She might be an all-in partisan or might be trying to get herself recused or maybe both at the same time.

Expand full comment

ttps://open.substack.com/pub/jtrudel/p/new-book-coming-soon-about-treason?r=6r9ya&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

We are indeed into the Treason Season. The radical left cannot keep a lid on truth much longer. Please share and repost as widely as you can. America has suffered STOLEN ELECTIONS, a well planned coup (by both parties). We've suffered what China calls "Unrestricted War" but we are waking up.

MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA.

Expand full comment

Extremely valuable public service journalism here. Thank you.

Expand full comment

The expedited briefing schedule is highly irregular, given the fact that no party asked for it and the Court gave no reason for arbitrarily suspending the local rules without prior notice.

Expand full comment