Thank you for the complete juror summary. I have little faith that Trump got a "jury of his peers". The whole charade is to convict him, so the MSM can use the term "convicted felon" incessantly before the election.
I try to keep in mind that all this is actually going to help Trump in the long run, but we may have to go through the painful process of witnessing this criminal court sentence him to jail.
Thank you. and yes Shameful; but it is obvious to me not only are these people reprobates who have NO shame and operate on some kind amoral neurosis suffering from memory lapses of what and where they post, the depth of the level of pure hate for Trump is bewildering to me. How can someone be like that and appear normal?
I am of the opinion 50% of the jurors are lying just to be on this bogus case. No way he gets a fair trial when most of them get their news from the anti Trump N.Y. Times.
Hard to imagine this would even be in court if not for strong judicial prejudice and a left political push to “get Trump” .A very sad situation for our country
I noted that as well.. very interesting.. which also means that are outliers and fall on the extreme end of the NORMAL biological curve. Being a parent is part of learning about life, compassion, empathy and NORMALCY, unless one cannot for some medical reason have children. A couple sound possibly too young (in their 20s or early 30s so that could be reason. I waited to have children because I wanted to finish my education.. (six years).. but I agree in essence w/ your interesting observation which I also noted.
I would wager every single one of the selected jurors lied to get on the jury and the odds are high all six come to the trial with a strong anti-Trump bias. One pro-Trump juror might have snuck through, but I would bet the prosecution knew far more about the pool than Trump's lawyers did.
Thank you for posting this info on the jurors, much appreciated. Looks like it doesn't bode well for Trump. I will say, though, that after watching Trump for 45 yrs, the word from his friends & his enemies is: Never underestimate Trump. NEVER. Not for nothing is he known as The Comeback Kid. Trump is no idiot, he's always several steps at least ahead of his enemies. The deep state is not as smart as it likes to think it is.
If I'm being honest, I've lost a lot of faith in the system of "being judged by my peers." We've seen far too much judicial activism & jurist activism the past few years. I'm not sure what, if anything, could convince me that Themis is still blind.
They never tell jurors what their rights are as jurors, such as being allowed to ask questions DURING the trial itself. The jury system itself is a sham. And prosecutors routinely abuse the jury process. It's sickening and disgusting once you know what the case law is governing the rights of the jurors and the things Can in fact do
Continue to pray for Preside t Trump! This is a battle over Good vs. Evil - don’t miss that critical fact! We have the tools and the support we need from above, but America will only be saved if we are brave enough to stand against evil. It’s not complicated. We will get what we tolerate - what we invite - what we create!
She gets her news from the New York Times, CNN, Google, and has a Facebook account. .. uh huh.
The jurors sounds as ridiculous as the case. OMG. According to what I heard there are two attorneys on there. I will share that on Twitter.. see what others think. Right, sure they are not they have no opinion on Trump. Give me a break; Meanwhile Bidenbot in Scranton. GOOD JOB.. on your part.. Techno.
All of them get their news from the corporate propaganda liberal biased media. The John Durham trials proved that politics trumps the law. Pun intended.
Despite the most vigorous and successful jury selection efforts by Trump’s defense team I fear the NSA contractors that have access to computers that control the initial “cast of the net” for the jury pool and “filter” all those called upon to server using NSA data to tilt all possible choices in their favor. I saw a podcast documentary in which the actual hands on players confessed. Prove me wrong. I can no longer find that documentary now a year or two later. Our only hope for justice is in the hands of citizens seeing the truth and doing the right thing in the jury.
#1 Blue collar Trump guy. If he reads the NYT, it's the sports page.
#2 is an AWFL. This type cannot keep quiet. Search her social media, she probably scrubbed it, but unless it was professionally done, there will be residue. if she cannot be unseated, she is a mortal lock to convict.
#3 too close to the vest to tell. Asian is not descriptive enough, if his family once came from a communist country, that's good for Trump.
#4 "fascinating and mysterious." Trump guy.
#5 too close to the vest to tell. Admits she like Trump's bluntness, and I kind of believe it. I'd have let her on.
#6 perhaps not an AWFL, but probably has a pussy hat in her sock drawer. Find a way to get her off, or kiss acquittal goodbye.
Thank you for the complete juror summary. I have little faith that Trump got a "jury of his peers". The whole charade is to convict him, so the MSM can use the term "convicted felon" incessantly before the election.
I try to keep in mind that all this is actually going to help Trump in the long run, but we may have to go through the painful process of witnessing this criminal court sentence him to jail.
Shameful in its entirety.
Thank you. and yes Shameful; but it is obvious to me not only are these people reprobates who have NO shame and operate on some kind amoral neurosis suffering from memory lapses of what and where they post, the depth of the level of pure hate for Trump is bewildering to me. How can someone be like that and appear normal?
I am of the opinion 50% of the jurors are lying just to be on this bogus case. No way he gets a fair trial when most of them get their news from the anti Trump N.Y. Times.
You nailed it.. for sure
Almost no one who isnt a highly overpaid white liberal moron reads The NY Times.
Hard to imagine this would even be in court if not for strong judicial prejudice and a left political push to “get Trump” .A very sad situation for our country
Thanks for breaking this down. Could be a lot worse, but 4 New York Times readers is concerning. None of them have children, which is in line for the typical NYC PMC NPC: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/how-to-write-a-sex-diary
I noted that as well.. very interesting.. which also means that are outliers and fall on the extreme end of the NORMAL biological curve. Being a parent is part of learning about life, compassion, empathy and NORMALCY, unless one cannot for some medical reason have children. A couple sound possibly too young (in their 20s or early 30s so that could be reason. I waited to have children because I wanted to finish my education.. (six years).. but I agree in essence w/ your interesting observation which I also noted.
I would wager every single one of the selected jurors lied to get on the jury and the odds are high all six come to the trial with a strong anti-Trump bias. One pro-Trump juror might have snuck through, but I would bet the prosecution knew far more about the pool than Trump's lawyers did.
Thank you for posting this info on the jurors, much appreciated. Looks like it doesn't bode well for Trump. I will say, though, that after watching Trump for 45 yrs, the word from his friends & his enemies is: Never underestimate Trump. NEVER. Not for nothing is he known as The Comeback Kid. Trump is no idiot, he's always several steps at least ahead of his enemies. The deep state is not as smart as it likes to think it is.
If I'm being honest, I've lost a lot of faith in the system of "being judged by my peers." We've seen far too much judicial activism & jurist activism the past few years. I'm not sure what, if anything, could convince me that Themis is still blind.
They never tell jurors what their rights are as jurors, such as being allowed to ask questions DURING the trial itself. The jury system itself is a sham. And prosecutors routinely abuse the jury process. It's sickening and disgusting once you know what the case law is governing the rights of the jurors and the things Can in fact do
Continue to pray for Preside t Trump! This is a battle over Good vs. Evil - don’t miss that critical fact! We have the tools and the support we need from above, but America will only be saved if we are brave enough to stand against evil. It’s not complicated. We will get what we tolerate - what we invite - what we create!
Readers of NYT and or watchers of CNN should be disqualified.
Automatically
She gets her news from the New York Times, CNN, Google, and has a Facebook account. .. uh huh.
The jurors sounds as ridiculous as the case. OMG. According to what I heard there are two attorneys on there. I will share that on Twitter.. see what others think. Right, sure they are not they have no opinion on Trump. Give me a break; Meanwhile Bidenbot in Scranton. GOOD JOB.. on your part.. Techno.
All of them get their news from the corporate propaganda liberal biased media. The John Durham trials proved that politics trumps the law. Pun intended.
Durham hand picked by Billy Barr. I knew it was going to be a lot of theater, and it was.
I believe in jury nullification
Was there an IQ test given to the jurors?
Third world tactics - Obama's third term sucks in every way.
AMEN! DROP THE MIC!
Despite the most vigorous and successful jury selection efforts by Trump’s defense team I fear the NSA contractors that have access to computers that control the initial “cast of the net” for the jury pool and “filter” all those called upon to server using NSA data to tilt all possible choices in their favor. I saw a podcast documentary in which the actual hands on players confessed. Prove me wrong. I can no longer find that documentary now a year or two later. Our only hope for justice is in the hands of citizens seeing the truth and doing the right thing in the jury.
Almost hoping against hope. But we now see just how rotten to the core the state and federal court systems really are.
#1 Blue collar Trump guy. If he reads the NYT, it's the sports page.
#2 is an AWFL. This type cannot keep quiet. Search her social media, she probably scrubbed it, but unless it was professionally done, there will be residue. if she cannot be unseated, she is a mortal lock to convict.
#3 too close to the vest to tell. Asian is not descriptive enough, if his family once came from a communist country, that's good for Trump.
#4 "fascinating and mysterious." Trump guy.
#5 too close to the vest to tell. Admits she like Trump's bluntness, and I kind of believe it. I'd have let her on.
#6 perhaps not an AWFL, but probably has a pussy hat in her sock drawer. Find a way to get her off, or kiss acquittal goodbye.
If I'm right about NY criminal jury law, there has to be a majority for acquittal. God save us, and save this poor sinner.