Megyn Kelly had another great podcast on Tucker today. This time with Victor David Hansen. I think the speculation the family is preparing to sell Fox News (apparently the Murdoch children don’t like each other much) and/ or it’s a capitulation to neocons like Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell. Apparently Fox didn’t actually “fire” Tucker - they silenced him while censoring him via the contract - and are refusing to tell anyone why they did this. Anywho, it’s a good listen but I too am saddened. I know by the time my kids graduate from college the network TV with show time slots will either be gone, or about as watched as a Garmin GPS is used today. But until then the remaining souls still watching cable won’t have a voice of reason or push back on the uniparty.
On a brighter note Tucker has a great lawyer and his audience will follow. This will also hasten the fall of traditional television networks. They need to go. For all the networks out there, the content is crap. We might even see the birth/ growth of streaming news when Tucker shows up again. I’m betting he’ll start with half a dozen Substack writers as guests. (I know, Greenwald is trying, but the set is terrible. Epoch news does as well but I never actually watch 🤦♀️).
I feel the same way. I felt more normal after his show - and scheduled my dinner time around it. It was my sane pill. My clarity. My peace. I walked around last night & tonight & having that extra hour - was not something I wanted. I dreaded it - I wanted to hear him laugh. I wanted to see his expressions & of course, I wanted to hear the truth.
Thank you for putting words to what I'm feeling - especially about his laugh. I will admit there were times I felt exhausted - almost too exhausted to listen to the truth. So much information and deception coming from all sides, but then I'd settle in and watch him, ready for my "medicine". I nearly always came away feeling lighter/less burdened. I'm ready to see him on whatever platform he chooses.
Tucker wasn’t a good object of that. He criticized Sydney Powell on air, and never had her on his show. Also - BlackRock is why people need to stop with the passive investments. There are more passive investment options (fund options) by a lot than there are public stocks to invest in. BlackRock doesn’t own shit - BlackRock used the assets owned by Tucker’s viewers to sue themselves via their ETFs, mutual funds, pensions, and 401(k) funds. None of this will stop until people manage their own investments or start hiring advisors who actually know WTF they are doing and directly invest your money into stocks/ bonds.
I’m married to a an advisor employed at a wire house that does all direct investment for his clients - no funds, no CIO models (firm models masquerading as direct investment), no internal or external money managers - it’s pure direct purchase of stocks, bonds, munis, t-bills. He’s also been named one of the top advisors in our state the last 4 or 5 years. He’ll tell anyone it’s not that hard. You don’t need to pay fund companies. What they are doing isn’t rocket science and if your advisor can’t directly invest competently, they aren’t a financial advisor, they are a fund sales rep masquerading as an advisor.
Huh? Tucker wasn’t why Dominion sued Fox. I’m not casting anything on anyone. I’m pointing out a fact - Tucker did not host Sydney Powell to make any accusations against Dominion, and Tucker criticized her on air several times for not providing evidence. That is plainly stating facts.
Commercial??? That’s insulting. No one on here has a clue who I am, much less my husband. I’m not drumming up business for anyone. I’m advocating people take control of their own wealth and stop letting it be used against them. Look how people talk - “BlackRock owns this, Vanguard owns that.” They don’t “own” anything but the share votes. They are crappy asset managers, not asset owners. The very people complaining about this stuff are often unwittingly the same ones invested in BlackRock products.
She has a point, though. We have to proactively take action to move our investments away from the very people or companies aligned and directly part of the WEF that has been actively involved with Klaus Schwab’s choking and suffocating desire to take away our liberties and openly declared & continues to declare that agenda.
Oh please. I’m advocating for ALL people to take personal responsibility for their own wealth, with or without the help of any Financial Advisor. Too often people hit the easy button on their own wealth - either by either investing directly, or via a funds salespeople masquerading as a “financial advisor,” when they park their personal wealth in ETFs and mutual funds run by institutional investment companies like BlackRock and Vanguard. That easy button comes at a price more people should better understand. Biden has used regulations to legalize institutional fund managers placing their own personal ideology above their fiduciary duty to their clients in how they manage funds and vote shares. Too few understand the price for that “easy button.” Those institutional fund managers use perfectly legal practices to leverage the wealth of their “clients” for the interest of the institution, even if it’s not in their clients’ financial interest, and this applies to board votes for passively managed index funds and any fund regardless of wether or not a particular fund is claiming to be managed with ESG (or similar) considerations. Biden has given legal cover for institutional investment funds to do this. Investors can’t even pull their investment from a particular stock they don’t want to own with funds. People should either stop complaining about BlackRock and the like altogether, or they can and should stop investing their personal wealth into funds where fund management utilizes their personal wealth against their interest.
😂😂😂. A “commercial” ......... that failed to give any specific information on who my husband is or how to contact him....... odd supposed “commercial” where nothing about my comment even could result in drumming up clients for my unidentified husband 😂.
I like to judge a person by their enemies, Tucker had enemies to be proud of, he and I share the same enemies. Tucker will be his on boss now, podcast maybe. Whatever he chooses I will be right there with him.
Really great assessment, Techo Fog. Tucker was my nightly ritual; a moment of validation of sorts that he sees what I see in this world. I miss him terribly. Wherever he comes out, it won't be the same not seeing him on TV.
Fox News is already seeing the devastation it has cause for their network. Subscribers are dropping from Fox Nation and their operating capital is starting to see the hit.
I did. I cancelled through Apple so it won’t stop until May 5th. Fox had the gull to send out emails yesterday and today promoting Tucker Carlson Today and Tucker Carlson Origionals. 😂🤦♀️😂. Idiots. I unsubscribed from the emails too. Just finishing up Megyn Kelly’s second fantastic podcast on this 💩.
Word is that possibly Fox will be sold, especially after Tucker sues them for firing him without warning or a severance package. What ever happens, they will drag it out to keep him silent through the election.
They didn’t fire him. He’s still under contract - which they are using to silence him. “Here, we won’t tell you or anyone why we pulled your shows, but will threaten you with financial ruin if you try to speak so will keep paying you since you are the best deal in TV.”
I am going whole hog. I am canceling Dish. I don’t really watch TV that much. Anyway, I was just keeping cable to watch Tucker. It’s $173 a month, isn’t that crazy? I must’ve been crazy to keep Dish, I did it just for Tucker. Now that’s dedication! lol
I have no idea why it was so much. I’ve moved so many times, I can’t keep up with it. I think we just kept moving our receiver from state to state. But it’s gone now and I’m using Pluto TV and it’s free.
“ Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity.” -C. Hitchens.
Paul Ryan is a spectator and a sycophant. Alternatively, Tucker Carlson is a fierce warrior with the gift of insight, language, and moral purpose. We will see him back soon!
No, there is no replacement for Tucker Carlson in cable news, and I spent much of yesterday feeling adrift. But there is a replacement for cable news, and my hope is that by firing Carlson, Fox put the final nail in the coffin of traditional media and will lead more people to look for independent media.
"While he spoke truth to power, he served a greater role: he spoke truth to the powerless on matters that took courage and required principle." THIS is exactly why I and so many others like me love and respect Tucker Carlson. And frankly, I can't imagine that he will not be back on TV at some point. For now, I hope he can enjoy some well deserved and well earned time off, then I hope he will see what his options are to be back.
He has hired a good attorney to work it out but even still these things can easily take over a year to resolve - especially if one party is trying to stall. The entire point is to silence Tucker in the run up to the 2024 election. That is why they did it.
The Deep State (and BlackRock who with Vanguard own more than the Murdochs) wanted Tucker Gone.
Make no mistake, if you reveal the man behind the curtain, you will be 1) assisinated 2)Murdered 3) they will stage a terrorist attack (9/11) or 4) rigg an election.
If you don't get that we are controlled by the deep state (CIA FBI NAC/etc. etc.) and have been since Kennedy was assisinated then you haven't been paying attention.
All MSM is owned by BlackRock, StateSTreet, and Vanguard. They have the controlling interest in every one of them.
And the Republic has been over...now is just the mopping up operation.
Alex Jones was right again. He said Tucker was having issues over Jan 6 tapes and will be gone soon. Fox didn't want people to see those. And if you remember, Tucker started showing them and then abruptly stopped after a few days. In fact I think they showed 1 or 2 things over and over with nothing new for a week, then gone. I don't understand why it wasn't released publicly like McCarthy promised. Why is Fox getting the video and not the public? Congress should not be working for Fox or Tucker, they should give our information to us.
Tucker will be back soon! Legacy Media is now truly dead! Ticker will emerge stronger than ever with more of a voice and I, for one, having given up Fox five years ago will be glad to be 100% done with them and participating in Tuckers new platform.
Haven’t felt like this since rush died. It’s like a part of my family was taken. I know he will go on to better things but he was part of my family’s routine. Every night at 8. It’s sad bc I see that money isn’t the driver any longer. The libs have infiltrated everything. They destroy our way of life and leave it in tatters. If they can get Tucker what chance do I have
Techno, this is an interesting day as for once I get to disagree with you, if only partially.
Your listing of causes for Tucker's termination are likely all correct in some matter of degree among them. It sounds like Murdoch's son was the driver behind it. You bring up a great point about Paul Ryan who would be cheering for Tucker to exit the building on sixth avenue.
Around the same time Tucker was lambasting other DNC Media for taking tons of Big Pharma money, he would do a show claiming the nuclear energy plant in Ukraine occupied currently by Putin's illegal invasion was making nuclear weapons and the US is protesting any nuclear technology collection by Russia there.
Being that the nuclear energy plant, the biggest in Europe is incapable of producing any enrichment level for a nuclear weapon, this allegation of "nuclear technology = nuclear weapons" is not a small error. It's an international error by Tucker who has ramped up his intellectual dishonesty on Ukraine and its self-defense against Putin's illegal invasion.
We batted this around on Sasha's page and she oddly appears enthralled to share this less than scientific allegation against the US and Ukraine. So very strange.
What a LIE!!! Anyone can look up Tucker monologue April 19, 2023. He first talked about US biolabs, which have been confirmed to be real, in Ukraine. Then he referred to a CNN story about the Biden administration being worried about sensitive US nuclear tech AT the Soviet era and soviet built nuclear power plant Russia has occupied in Ukraine for about a year, and Tucker said "What exactly is "sensitive American nuclear technology"? Sensitive American nuclear technology? Probably not to produce energy. No one in the media is going to ask that question. But if it's in the middle of Ukraine, in the middle of a war, it stands to reason this sensitive American nuclear technology has military applications. In other words, these are nuclear weapons. What else could they be? We'll stop speculating there." I have added a post for the entire monologue below to Techno Fog to see.
Your entire statement about Tucker is a straw man. You made a false assertion Tucker equated nuclear power to nuclear weapons, which he CLEARLY didn’t. You then used your false assertion to attack Tucker despite the plan truth that your assertion wasn’t true to begin with.
The plant being discussed was built between 1971-1977 and doesn’t contain US nuclear power generating technology anyway. I just listened. Tucker in NO WAY said nuclear plants = nuclear technology for weapons. It’s not unheard of for governments to hide nuclear tech related to weapons, and unrelated to power generation, at nuclear plants because it’s harder for other governments to detect the activity. All Tucker said was if the Biden administration is worried about sensitive US nuclear technology falling into Russia’s hands, then its US nuclear weapons tech. At no point and in NO WAY did Tucker make anything close to an assertion that nuclear power generation = nuclear weapons technology. You pulled that out of this air.
Sensitive technology doesn't equal nukes but that's what Tucker is selling.
"These are NUCLEAR WEAPONS." - Tucker Carlson
My apologies did I say weapons? I meant what Tucker said, "These are NUCLEAR WEAPONS!"
Ok, he's not selling anything today. Today, he's collecting a big check.
Please feel free to check my Tucker Carlson "nuclear weapons" quote at the nuclear energy plant in Ukraine that can't make enriched uranium for nuclear weapons.
What a silly lie Horsey. Tucker Carlson absolutely did NOT say, in reference to nuclear power, "these are nuclear weapons." In fact, as is evident to anyone who can read a whole paragraph unlike you, he specifically said "sensitive American nuclear technology" was probably NOT for power. Anyone can read the full quote in my comment above or below and plainly see you are lying, and you are just really angry for being called out for lying.
Everyone with 2 brain cells and the tiniest bit of intellectual curiosity either already knows, or can easily verify, the power plant being discussed was not bult with US nuclear power technology. Its easy to verify the power plant itself is a Soviet plant built in the 1970's with Soviet technology and the sensitive US technology the Biden administration is worried about is simply located AT the plant. You are clearly an unserious person. I am deleting my other comments because I trust most of the readers of this stack have enough intelligence to plainly see you are lying about Tucker and there is no need to keep repeating what is evident in Tucker's actual comments (as opposed to your intentional mischaracterization regarding the subject of the one sentence you "quoted").
Full Quote:
"So this is a significant concern and essentially in this letter that has been reviewed by CNN sent by the US Department of Energy to Rossatom. The US government has essentially warned Moscow not to touch the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant because of the sensitive American nuclear technology at the plant. So many questions here, but we'll begin with the biggest one. What exactly is "sensitive American nuclear technology"? Sensitive American nuclear technology? Probably not to produce energy. No one in the media is going to ask that question. But if it's in the middle of Ukraine, in the middle of a war, it stands to reason this sensitive American nuclear technology has military applications. In other words, these are nuclear weapons. What else could they be? We'll stop speculating there."
Anyone can listen to Tucker Carlson on this and hear exactly what he said and how I accurately quoted him.
"In other words, these are NUCLEAR WEAPONS."
Carlson even goes further asking, "What else could they be?" Obviously for Tucker, "these are nuclear weapons."
I'm right and you're wrong. It's the simple. Instead of deleting your earlier comments, you should apologize and learn how to accept being wrong instead of being annoying about an obvious accurate quote because your ego is imploding.
You claimed “Being that the nuclear energy plant, the biggest in Europe is incapable of producing any enrichment level for a nuclear weapon, this allegation of "nuclear technology = nuclear weapons" is not a small error.” Tucker never claimed nuclear plants WERE capable of producing nuclear weapons. He never said nuclear technology = nuclear weapons. It is well known nuclear plants can be used as a front, since the Cold War, to hide nuclear weapons technology. He noted our sensitive technology is located AT the plant, which is near Russia. He speculated that we wouldn’t have sensitive nuclear technology at some Soviet era nuclear power plant in an Eastern European war zone unless it’s related to nuclear weapons. He may be wrong that the the specific technology referenced by the Biden administration in a Ukranian war zone technology is related to nuclear weapons, or he may be correct. There aren’t exactly an abundance of plausible reasons to hide sensitive American nuclear technology at a Soviet power plant in an Eastern European conflict zone, and no plausible explanation has been offered to date by the administration to explain what type of nuclear American nuclear technology was located at the plant. The justifications for the bio labs don’t pass a 9th grade sniff test.
You used a straw man to claim Tucker was conflating nuclear power plant capabilities with nuclear weapons technology - which he never inferred and specifically negated. Tucker never said nuclear technology is nuclear weapons.
No, my statement UNDERSTATED what Tucker Carlson said.
So I quoted him. Word for word.
I didn't falsely assert, I've quoted Tucker Carlson's exact words. These are his EXACT WORDS!
I'm not asserting, I'm QUOTING!
As for, "Russia has been operating the nuclear plant smoothly for a year" well, sure if you think threatening and putting guns at the heads of civilians working at the plant and kidnapping the head of it is all fine and dandy.
I quoted Tucker. Repeatedly. You want to pretend the quote Tucker made which I directly QUOTED did not happen, you can go anywhere you like and pretend it didn't happen.
Just don't blame me for QUOTING Tucker Carlson and his exact words, lady!
In addition, I'm not going to applaud Russia's illegal takeover of the nuclear energy plant. I simply pointed out FACTS!
Do you have a link where Tucker actually claimed this? I’ve literally never heard him say anything in that universe and I’d like to see what you are referencing on Ukraine.
We all owe him a debt of gratitude. Now I wait for him to be unleashed and wreck havoc on the demons who have taken over this beloved country of ours
Megyn Kelly had another great podcast on Tucker today. This time with Victor David Hansen. I think the speculation the family is preparing to sell Fox News (apparently the Murdoch children don’t like each other much) and/ or it’s a capitulation to neocons like Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell. Apparently Fox didn’t actually “fire” Tucker - they silenced him while censoring him via the contract - and are refusing to tell anyone why they did this. Anywho, it’s a good listen but I too am saddened. I know by the time my kids graduate from college the network TV with show time slots will either be gone, or about as watched as a Garmin GPS is used today. But until then the remaining souls still watching cable won’t have a voice of reason or push back on the uniparty.
On a brighter note Tucker has a great lawyer and his audience will follow. This will also hasten the fall of traditional television networks. They need to go. For all the networks out there, the content is crap. We might even see the birth/ growth of streaming news when Tucker shows up again. I’m betting he’ll start with half a dozen Substack writers as guests. (I know, Greenwald is trying, but the set is terrible. Epoch news does as well but I never actually watch 🤦♀️).
Loved your comments. You should watch Epoch Times TV. It’s awesome!
Tucker's clear-eyed perspective saved my life during COVID.
Same here………
As an unvaxxed person, I was thrilled to find out that Tucker was unvaxxed as well.
We are numerous💃🏻
And healthy
I feel the same way. I felt more normal after his show - and scheduled my dinner time around it. It was my sane pill. My clarity. My peace. I walked around last night & tonight & having that extra hour - was not something I wanted. I dreaded it - I wanted to hear him laugh. I wanted to see his expressions & of course, I wanted to hear the truth.
Thank you for putting words to what I'm feeling - especially about his laugh. I will admit there were times I felt exhausted - almost too exhausted to listen to the truth. So much information and deception coming from all sides, but then I'd settle in and watch him, ready for my "medicine". I nearly always came away feeling lighter/less burdened. I'm ready to see him on whatever platform he chooses.
IS
I will follow Tucker not Fox!
Amen. Tucker stood in the eye of the storm and spoke truth to power.
This man is a hero.
* Blockrock owns 59.M shares of Dominion
* Blackrock owns 45.7M shares of Fox.
* Blackrock sued itself and fired Tucker Carlson as part of that lawsuit.
FIGURED IT OUT YET?
Tucker wasn’t a good object of that. He criticized Sydney Powell on air, and never had her on his show. Also - BlackRock is why people need to stop with the passive investments. There are more passive investment options (fund options) by a lot than there are public stocks to invest in. BlackRock doesn’t own shit - BlackRock used the assets owned by Tucker’s viewers to sue themselves via their ETFs, mutual funds, pensions, and 401(k) funds. None of this will stop until people manage their own investments or start hiring advisors who actually know WTF they are doing and directly invest your money into stocks/ bonds.
I’m married to a an advisor employed at a wire house that does all direct investment for his clients - no funds, no CIO models (firm models masquerading as direct investment), no internal or external money managers - it’s pure direct purchase of stocks, bonds, munis, t-bills. He’s also been named one of the top advisors in our state the last 4 or 5 years. He’ll tell anyone it’s not that hard. You don’t need to pay fund companies. What they are doing isn’t rocket science and if your advisor can’t directly invest competently, they aren’t a financial advisor, they are a fund sales rep masquerading as an advisor.
Other than your slam of Tucker, your post is excellent
I didn’t slam Tucker.
You are either casting aspersions on Sydney Powell or Tucker.
Huh? Tucker wasn’t why Dominion sued Fox. I’m not casting anything on anyone. I’m pointing out a fact - Tucker did not host Sydney Powell to make any accusations against Dominion, and Tucker criticized her on air several times for not providing evidence. That is plainly stating facts.
I agree with Tucker that Powell is coo coo for coco puffs.
Done with your commercial? (And for full disclosure, I’m in the biz too)
Commercial??? That’s insulting. No one on here has a clue who I am, much less my husband. I’m not drumming up business for anyone. I’m advocating people take control of their own wealth and stop letting it be used against them. Look how people talk - “BlackRock owns this, Vanguard owns that.” They don’t “own” anything but the share votes. They are crappy asset managers, not asset owners. The very people complaining about this stuff are often unwittingly the same ones invested in BlackRock products.
You just wrote a long narrative about your husband and what he does. Good grief.
She has a point, though. We have to proactively take action to move our investments away from the very people or companies aligned and directly part of the WEF that has been actively involved with Klaus Schwab’s choking and suffocating desire to take away our liberties and openly declared & continues to declare that agenda.
Oh please. I’m advocating for ALL people to take personal responsibility for their own wealth, with or without the help of any Financial Advisor. Too often people hit the easy button on their own wealth - either by either investing directly, or via a funds salespeople masquerading as a “financial advisor,” when they park their personal wealth in ETFs and mutual funds run by institutional investment companies like BlackRock and Vanguard. That easy button comes at a price more people should better understand. Biden has used regulations to legalize institutional fund managers placing their own personal ideology above their fiduciary duty to their clients in how they manage funds and vote shares. Too few understand the price for that “easy button.” Those institutional fund managers use perfectly legal practices to leverage the wealth of their “clients” for the interest of the institution, even if it’s not in their clients’ financial interest, and this applies to board votes for passively managed index funds and any fund regardless of wether or not a particular fund is claiming to be managed with ESG (or similar) considerations. Biden has given legal cover for institutional investment funds to do this. Investors can’t even pull their investment from a particular stock they don’t want to own with funds. People should either stop complaining about BlackRock and the like altogether, or they can and should stop investing their personal wealth into funds where fund management utilizes their personal wealth against their interest.
😂😂😂. A “commercial” ......... that failed to give any specific information on who my husband is or how to contact him....... odd supposed “commercial” where nothing about my comment even could result in drumming up clients for my unidentified husband 😂.
Black rock needs a dose of nitroglycerin
Blackrock conjures up evil in my mind. Seems to be a force for evil rather than good.
The New World Order is evil like right out of a bad novel. Unaccountable ruling elites. What could possibly go wrong.
Here is a link to an excellent review of Mindless War Two, the most recent book by General Vallely and myself, and the book itself.
https://www.amazon.com/Mindless-War-Prism-Truths-Notes-ebook/dp/B0B57P574
https://www.theusreview.com/reviews-1/Mindless-War-Two-by-John-D-Trudel-and-General-Paul-E-Vallely.html#.ZDbpZfbMLIU
Tails you lose heads I win !
Thanks for the info!
I like to judge a person by their enemies, Tucker had enemies to be proud of, he and I share the same enemies. Tucker will be his on boss now, podcast maybe. Whatever he chooses I will be right there with him.
Me too!
Really great assessment, Techo Fog. Tucker was my nightly ritual; a moment of validation of sorts that he sees what I see in this world. I miss him terribly. Wherever he comes out, it won't be the same not seeing him on TV.
I never missed Tucker, Fox’s best asset. I’ve now fired Fox!
Fox News is already seeing the devastation it has cause for their network. Subscribers are dropping from Fox Nation and their operating capital is starting to see the hit.
I did. I cancelled through Apple so it won’t stop until May 5th. Fox had the gull to send out emails yesterday and today promoting Tucker Carlson Today and Tucker Carlson Origionals. 😂🤦♀️😂. Idiots. I unsubscribed from the emails too. Just finishing up Megyn Kelly’s second fantastic podcast on this 💩.
Word is that possibly Fox will be sold, especially after Tucker sues them for firing him without warning or a severance package. What ever happens, they will drag it out to keep him silent through the election.
THE EVIL GOES DEEP.
They didn’t fire him. He’s still under contract - which they are using to silence him. “Here, we won’t tell you or anyone why we pulled your shows, but will threaten you with financial ruin if you try to speak so will keep paying you since you are the best deal in TV.”
I am going whole hog. I am canceling Dish. I don’t really watch TV that much. Anyway, I was just keeping cable to watch Tucker. It’s $173 a month, isn’t that crazy? I must’ve been crazy to keep Dish, I did it just for Tucker. Now that’s dedication! lol
Crazy, yes. Especially since you could have streamed FOX Nation for $7 a month. I did, but cancelled yesterday.
I love you!!!
Boy, did Dish scam you! You must have had all the (useless) movie channels. Should have been paying $100 or less per month.
I have no idea why it was so much. I’ve moved so many times, I can’t keep up with it. I think we just kept moving our receiver from state to state. But it’s gone now and I’m using Pluto TV and it’s free.
TPTB have an infinite money supply.
Why is anyone still watching Fox after they called AZ against Trump. Dump Fox.
All the networks called AZ for Biden.
“ Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity.” -C. Hitchens.
Paul Ryan is a spectator and a sycophant. Alternatively, Tucker Carlson is a fierce warrior with the gift of insight, language, and moral purpose. We will see him back soon!
No, there is no replacement for Tucker Carlson in cable news, and I spent much of yesterday feeling adrift. But there is a replacement for cable news, and my hope is that by firing Carlson, Fox put the final nail in the coffin of traditional media and will lead more people to look for independent media.
"While he spoke truth to power, he served a greater role: he spoke truth to the powerless on matters that took courage and required principle." THIS is exactly why I and so many others like me love and respect Tucker Carlson. And frankly, I can't imagine that he will not be back on TV at some point. For now, I hope he can enjoy some well deserved and well earned time off, then I hope he will see what his options are to be back.
He’ll be back on Rumble
I hope so! 🙏🙏
No he won't. He is still under contract at Fox News and they didn't fire him. They are paying to silence him.
I imagine he has FU money and he will have backers that will help him with that.
He has hired a good attorney to work it out but even still these things can easily take over a year to resolve - especially if one party is trying to stall. The entire point is to silence Tucker in the run up to the 2024 election. That is why they did it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7Kna7Y12aE&t=643s
The Deep State (and BlackRock who with Vanguard own more than the Murdochs) wanted Tucker Gone.
Make no mistake, if you reveal the man behind the curtain, you will be 1) assisinated 2)Murdered 3) they will stage a terrorist attack (9/11) or 4) rigg an election.
If you don't get that we are controlled by the deep state (CIA FBI NAC/etc. etc.) and have been since Kennedy was assisinated then you haven't been paying attention.
All MSM is owned by BlackRock, StateSTreet, and Vanguard. They have the controlling interest in every one of them.
And the Republic has been over...now is just the mopping up operation.
𝙀𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙒𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙 𝙀𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙖𝙧𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙖 𝙛𝙚𝙬 𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙤𝙨 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙖, 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙆𝙡𝙖𝙪𝙨 𝙎𝙘𝙝𝙬𝙖𝙗𝙗, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙖𝙞𝙙, “...𝙔𝙤𝙪 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙗𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙮...“ 😤🤬
That’s my view as well. Horrific. Satanic Bolshevist faction clearly rules the west.
Alex Jones was right again. He said Tucker was having issues over Jan 6 tapes and will be gone soon. Fox didn't want people to see those. And if you remember, Tucker started showing them and then abruptly stopped after a few days. In fact I think they showed 1 or 2 things over and over with nothing new for a week, then gone. I don't understand why it wasn't released publicly like McCarthy promised. Why is Fox getting the video and not the public? Congress should not be working for Fox or Tucker, they should give our information to us.
BTW: I do think Tucker was the best thing on Fox.
Tucker will be back soon! Legacy Media is now truly dead! Ticker will emerge stronger than ever with more of a voice and I, for one, having given up Fox five years ago will be glad to be 100% done with them and participating in Tuckers new platform.
Haven’t felt like this since rush died. It’s like a part of my family was taken. I know he will go on to better things but he was part of my family’s routine. Every night at 8. It’s sad bc I see that money isn’t the driver any longer. The libs have infiltrated everything. They destroy our way of life and leave it in tatters. If they can get Tucker what chance do I have
Techno, this is an interesting day as for once I get to disagree with you, if only partially.
Your listing of causes for Tucker's termination are likely all correct in some matter of degree among them. It sounds like Murdoch's son was the driver behind it. You bring up a great point about Paul Ryan who would be cheering for Tucker to exit the building on sixth avenue.
Around the same time Tucker was lambasting other DNC Media for taking tons of Big Pharma money, he would do a show claiming the nuclear energy plant in Ukraine occupied currently by Putin's illegal invasion was making nuclear weapons and the US is protesting any nuclear technology collection by Russia there.
Being that the nuclear energy plant, the biggest in Europe is incapable of producing any enrichment level for a nuclear weapon, this allegation of "nuclear technology = nuclear weapons" is not a small error. It's an international error by Tucker who has ramped up his intellectual dishonesty on Ukraine and its self-defense against Putin's illegal invasion.
We batted this around on Sasha's page and she oddly appears enthralled to share this less than scientific allegation against the US and Ukraine. So very strange.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/my-favorite-episode-of-tucker-carlson/comments#comment-15211202
Now back to our host's great programming. Thanks Techno Fog.
What a LIE!!! Anyone can look up Tucker monologue April 19, 2023. He first talked about US biolabs, which have been confirmed to be real, in Ukraine. Then he referred to a CNN story about the Biden administration being worried about sensitive US nuclear tech AT the Soviet era and soviet built nuclear power plant Russia has occupied in Ukraine for about a year, and Tucker said "What exactly is "sensitive American nuclear technology"? Sensitive American nuclear technology? Probably not to produce energy. No one in the media is going to ask that question. But if it's in the middle of Ukraine, in the middle of a war, it stands to reason this sensitive American nuclear technology has military applications. In other words, these are nuclear weapons. What else could they be? We'll stop speculating there." I have added a post for the entire monologue below to Techno Fog to see.
Your entire statement about Tucker is a straw man. You made a false assertion Tucker equated nuclear power to nuclear weapons, which he CLEARLY didn’t. You then used your false assertion to attack Tucker despite the plan truth that your assertion wasn’t true to begin with.
The plant being discussed was built between 1971-1977 and doesn’t contain US nuclear power generating technology anyway. I just listened. Tucker in NO WAY said nuclear plants = nuclear technology for weapons. It’s not unheard of for governments to hide nuclear tech related to weapons, and unrelated to power generation, at nuclear plants because it’s harder for other governments to detect the activity. All Tucker said was if the Biden administration is worried about sensitive US nuclear technology falling into Russia’s hands, then its US nuclear weapons tech. At no point and in NO WAY did Tucker make anything close to an assertion that nuclear power generation = nuclear weapons technology. You pulled that out of this air.
https://www.novakarchive.com/fox-news-tucker-carlson/2023/4/19/tucker-carlson-april-19-2023-transcript
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/my-favorite-episode-of-tucker-carlson?r=16x75&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Sensitive technology doesn't equal nukes but that's what Tucker is selling.
"These are NUCLEAR WEAPONS." - Tucker Carlson
My apologies did I say weapons? I meant what Tucker said, "These are NUCLEAR WEAPONS!"
Ok, he's not selling anything today. Today, he's collecting a big check.
Please feel free to check my Tucker Carlson "nuclear weapons" quote at the nuclear energy plant in Ukraine that can't make enriched uranium for nuclear weapons.
And have a nice day.
What a silly lie Horsey. Tucker Carlson absolutely did NOT say, in reference to nuclear power, "these are nuclear weapons." In fact, as is evident to anyone who can read a whole paragraph unlike you, he specifically said "sensitive American nuclear technology" was probably NOT for power. Anyone can read the full quote in my comment above or below and plainly see you are lying, and you are just really angry for being called out for lying.
Everyone with 2 brain cells and the tiniest bit of intellectual curiosity either already knows, or can easily verify, the power plant being discussed was not bult with US nuclear power technology. Its easy to verify the power plant itself is a Soviet plant built in the 1970's with Soviet technology and the sensitive US technology the Biden administration is worried about is simply located AT the plant. You are clearly an unserious person. I am deleting my other comments because I trust most of the readers of this stack have enough intelligence to plainly see you are lying about Tucker and there is no need to keep repeating what is evident in Tucker's actual comments (as opposed to your intentional mischaracterization regarding the subject of the one sentence you "quoted").
Full Quote:
"So this is a significant concern and essentially in this letter that has been reviewed by CNN sent by the US Department of Energy to Rossatom. The US government has essentially warned Moscow not to touch the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant because of the sensitive American nuclear technology at the plant. So many questions here, but we'll begin with the biggest one. What exactly is "sensitive American nuclear technology"? Sensitive American nuclear technology? Probably not to produce energy. No one in the media is going to ask that question. But if it's in the middle of Ukraine, in the middle of a war, it stands to reason this sensitive American nuclear technology has military applications. In other words, these are nuclear weapons. What else could they be? We'll stop speculating there."
Grow up Horsey.
Anyone can listen to Tucker Carlson on this and hear exactly what he said and how I accurately quoted him.
"In other words, these are NUCLEAR WEAPONS."
Carlson even goes further asking, "What else could they be?" Obviously for Tucker, "these are nuclear weapons."
I'm right and you're wrong. It's the simple. Instead of deleting your earlier comments, you should apologize and learn how to accept being wrong instead of being annoying about an obvious accurate quote because your ego is imploding.
You should work on that. You're welcome.
You claimed “Being that the nuclear energy plant, the biggest in Europe is incapable of producing any enrichment level for a nuclear weapon, this allegation of "nuclear technology = nuclear weapons" is not a small error.” Tucker never claimed nuclear plants WERE capable of producing nuclear weapons. He never said nuclear technology = nuclear weapons. It is well known nuclear plants can be used as a front, since the Cold War, to hide nuclear weapons technology. He noted our sensitive technology is located AT the plant, which is near Russia. He speculated that we wouldn’t have sensitive nuclear technology at some Soviet era nuclear power plant in an Eastern European war zone unless it’s related to nuclear weapons. He may be wrong that the the specific technology referenced by the Biden administration in a Ukranian war zone technology is related to nuclear weapons, or he may be correct. There aren’t exactly an abundance of plausible reasons to hide sensitive American nuclear technology at a Soviet power plant in an Eastern European conflict zone, and no plausible explanation has been offered to date by the administration to explain what type of nuclear American nuclear technology was located at the plant. The justifications for the bio labs don’t pass a 9th grade sniff test.
You used a straw man to claim Tucker was conflating nuclear power plant capabilities with nuclear weapons technology - which he never inferred and specifically negated. Tucker never said nuclear technology is nuclear weapons.
No, my statement UNDERSTATED what Tucker Carlson said.
So I quoted him. Word for word.
I didn't falsely assert, I've quoted Tucker Carlson's exact words. These are his EXACT WORDS!
I'm not asserting, I'm QUOTING!
As for, "Russia has been operating the nuclear plant smoothly for a year" well, sure if you think threatening and putting guns at the heads of civilians working at the plant and kidnapping the head of it is all fine and dandy.
You can own that one too. SMH
You have a problem with facts, not me.
I quoted Tucker. Repeatedly. You want to pretend the quote Tucker made which I directly QUOTED did not happen, you can go anywhere you like and pretend it didn't happen.
Just don't blame me for QUOTING Tucker Carlson and his exact words, lady!
In addition, I'm not going to applaud Russia's illegal takeover of the nuclear energy plant. I simply pointed out FACTS!
Do you have a link where Tucker actually claimed this? I’ve literally never heard him say anything in that universe and I’d like to see what you are referencing on Ukraine.
If you have ears, that should work fine as it was one of his recent final videos where he pushed the fallacy "nuclear technology = nuclear weapons."
He said it. It was intellectually dishonest. Tucker knows it.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/my-favorite-episode-of-tucker-carlson
Uh, Tucker never equated nuclear power to sensitive US nuclear tech in this video.......
Your attempts at dissembling are silly, folks are noticing.
You should try to put your ego in check, ma'm.