72 Comments
Mar 4Liked by Techno Fog

Praise God for each and every victory against these tyrants, however big or small!!

Expand full comment

There was literally no other decision the Court could have made and retained its legitimacy. I'm glad they made it unanimous to spare everyone an even bigger issue.

Expand full comment

Remember when Twitter deleted President Trump's January 6th tweet only 30 seconds after he made it? I wonder why they did that? But too late, it was captured and saved :-) and thank God for Elon restoring all of it!

Expand full comment

I predicted 7-3, glad to see 9-0, it is the correct ruling. Unfortunately the Dems will try another angle to attack and disqualify him, it is not over yet folks. They are in meltdown mode and will sadly implement more drastic measures. They lie and cheat for power, they are scared of President Trump!

Expand full comment

Seems to me that the only victory was that states couldn’t remove a federal candidate, but they left open that congress could still do this. With how corrupt our legislative body is, wouldnt surprise me to see this angle taken next.

Expand full comment

Thanks for posting that so quickly: I do watch certain shows Mark Levin and others who keep track of the Constitutional impact of these lower court irregular/illegal rulings and I posted on X or somewhere.. Scotus "should rule" 9-0 on that. The idea that lower court judges can actually prevent ANY CANDIDATE from being on the PRESIDENTIAL Ballot is so preposterous SCOTUS should put this to rest FOREVER: Scotus got that right. Allowing the State Judiciary to interfere w/ a Federal election is not what was meant by the 14th. Thanks for explaining that so clearly. It is sort of complicated (not to me) but it would not only change future GOP elections it would have a deleterious impact on all future elections regardless of party by allowing partisan Judges at the state level to interfere with the Presidential elections. Thanks Techno.:)

Expand full comment

Satanists heads exploding in Colorado.

Congratulations President Trump and We The People.

Expand full comment

The U.S.Supreme Court must always uphold the rule of law and the Constitution. No matter what political party. It's great that they decided unanimously and this will shake up the DS no doubt...

Expand full comment

The opinion written by the Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson was an exercise in TDS butt-hurtedness. Their angle is essentially, “Yes, this was unconstitutional but we don’t like having to concur because of (imagined) misogyny, racism and Orange Man bad.”

Expand full comment

They know that a second Trump Administration will be hampered like never before, they will then remove this 'threat to Democracy' via the impeachment option, placing a vice-president into office.

This is why it does matter who Trump picks, look for it to be a surprise.

Expand full comment

I would also suggest that those who attempted to remove a candidate and thus the choice of the American voter, remember who these operatives were. Regardless of party affinity, this was a criminal act against the voting public, and these operatives should be remembered when it’s time for their elections.

Expand full comment

Thank goodness for small mercies and SCOTUS finally putting this issue to bed. However, I did have a bit of a reaction to their hesitancy in ‘nullifying the votes of millions’. We should therefore be thankful that this case was presented before the election, as it appears that, after an election, SCOTUS finds that nullifying the votes of millions as ‘moot’.

Expand full comment

Great legal analysis as always. The left wing media and those on the left are going crazy now you have Dem congressman Raskin talking nonsense saying if Dems take control of congress and Trump wins they won’t certified him as president. Talk about gaalighting insurrection these people are master at it.

Expand full comment

Well its sad we even had this happen. Some Democrats have really gone insane. Thank God the SC ended this nonsense. 🇺🇸🇺🇸

Expand full comment

Count me unimpressed. SCOTUS needed to state definitively that in the absence of some sort of Congressional finding that an insurrection did in fact occur, nobody can be banned from anything whatsoever on the basis of the 14th amendment.

Instead, states can now prevent, say, JD Vance for serving as Senator because he has claimed that the 2020 election was stolen, and that claim amounts to "insurrection."

Brilliant split-the-baby jurisprudence, nice job Supremes!.

Expand full comment

It’s amazing to watch them all bellowing insurrection again . The screaming at the echo chamber X is unreal . Never mind the useless pundits on the squawk box . Unreal how pathetic these people are .

Expand full comment