58 Comments
User's avatar
Aja's avatar

Anyone who reads the NYT, Google and WaPo has already been indoctrinated that Trump is guilty. However, I believe Juror#8 could be Trump's best shot. Why you say? I don't know a single fly fisherman that's a liberal. Liberal's don't fish. They expect to be given the fish.

Thunder Road's avatar

This one got a literal LOL from me, re the fish.

Linda S Fox's avatar

He may not agree with the group, but is he strong enough to hold out when he receives pressure from the other jurors and judge? Compromise is the enemy here.

tarkine's avatar

I wish that were so. My fly fishing buddy is a Hollywood liberal and hates Trump.

Carolyn's avatar

Good article but I doubt seriously these people can be impartial. Looking at their limited resources for news, I am doubtful

MT's avatar

That's valid, however, the real question is are they critical thinkers?

Swan's avatar

Not if they think the NY Times or CNN is telling the truth...

MT's avatar

Thinking critically is somewhat the opposite of buying into the blah-blah-blah spewed by the MSM.

Thinking critically is looking at the situation, listening to the voices speaking on both sides and evaluating the relevant terms of truth and reality that is presented or purposely hidden from public view.

Think Critically, because God gave each of us a brain to use to determine the Truth and Reality from Lies and Fiction.

Wakey-Wakey

Stay Frosty

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 17, 2024
Comment removed
MT's avatar

You seem nice.

Behind on your monthly trolling?

PPFFFTTTTTT!

MT's avatar

You seem nice.

Behind on your monthly trolling spree?

PPFFFFFTTTTTT

.

KimboThisIsMyCountry2's avatar

I would just hope they are individual thinkers and not mass thinkers!

Mark Marshall's avatar

I think 9 is lying and how the heck did number 11 even get on the jury!?!

Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Great work, thank you. You gave us an insight into the jury selection process, as well as these jurors who will be relied upon to be impartial. Let's hope they are.

Of course, I think the outcome has been predetermined. This is a deep state show trial with the purpose of continuing the overthrow and usurpation of our nation.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 17, 2024
Comment removed
Mark In Houston's avatar

You're a nasty, deluded and misguided a-hole Harrison. You need to STFU.

Van's avatar

It's not a jury of his peers!

Bill Beshlian's avatar

Correct. If it was a jury of his peers it would be 12 billionaires.

Van's avatar

plus: ex US Presidents

plus: people who grew up in the 50's and 60's and were raised in the sweet spot of the American way.

Mark's avatar

It’s a jury (and the prosecutors, and the judge) of Joe Biden’s peers, at least politically.

Song For the Deaf's avatar

Man, if this the closest they could get to a neutral jury, then I’d love to see the people Trump’s team rejected.

Unmarried professional women are biased on this by definition. Trump’s team must not have had any other choice.

Yancey Ward's avatar

"I hate Trump and hope he is dissolved in acid eventually, but for this trial I can be fair and impartial"

"This juror is acceptable to the court."

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 17, 2024
Comment removed
Yancey Ward's avatar

In your mom's bedroom.

War Eagle's avatar

I still think the majority of them are lying just to be able to brag about voting to find Trump guilty. I have a conspiracy theory, there will be jury tampering by the corrupt biased legal system.

Mark's avatar

That’s not a conspiracy theory, but an established fact. The jury tampering began before the indictments were ever announced, and will continue until the trial is over.

Much like the fraud in the 2020 presidential election, established fact.

Mindi's avatar

Working in the legal field for years, it seems most jurors really want to be on a jury— especially this one, fame, fame, fame 🙄

Science is Political 2.0's avatar

or shame shame shame.. no real difference is there?

Mac's avatar

The concern isn’t just that they’re liars - it’s why they lied.

☝🏻

Exactly. Fingers crossed.

CJ's avatar

perhaps you already know but heads-up: for sources Inner City Press (Matthew Russell Lee) also does play by play X/Tweets from inside the courtroom.

keep up the great work!

https://x.com/innercitypress?s=21&t=UjbP5i2nwgWOVhZICvEIXQ

Science is Political 2.0's avatar

we'll see how much they like the LEFT WING MEDIA PRESS LYNCH MOB.. because they are desperate to do something else besides cover Biden's WORLD WIDE WARS; just heard that Biden had HIGHLY TOP SECRET docs in his Garage.. on NewsMax. :) gets stranger and stranger.

Mark's avatar

“more like a lynch mob”….. which is exactly what they are intended to be.

beth02's avatar

There is no way any single juror - no matter his values or conscience - is going to risk hanging this jury. It's just not going to happen. As we saw with Covid, the Vax, etc. it's a very rare individual who is willing to be doxxed, villified, fired, etc. for their principles.

However, I do think there's a possibility as the weeks wear on that jurors get exposed and possibly removed - as independent journalists start digging into their backgrounds, tweets, etc. If that were to happen a number of seated jurors, well.... that would be quite something....

Let the games begin !

Swan's avatar

Anyone who reads the NY Times or watches CNN should have been immediately dismissed.

Science is Political 2.0's avatar

I LIKE YOUR STYLE.. :) we shall see.. shan't we? Way to go Techno! :)

Q10's avatar

When the idea of an impartial jury was set in practice, most of the popular media whether squires, radio, or TV was impartial. This media provided best effort of objective reporting AND thereby set a civil moral standard for society for the same honesty and objectivity.