I’m beginning to SEE what YOU are doing here and I love it! Three cheers for TechNo-Fog!
I haven’t gotten far into your work and this gem is absolutely making connections in my mind:
“The Special Counsel’s statement reminds us of this letter we discussed from Rodney Joffe’s attorney to the attorneys for Michael Sussmann, stating the Yota phone-related allegations percolated “through various branches of the government and around the private sector after that date, in various forms.”
Let’s just say, I’ll gladly accept an entire pot of Peruvian Coffee.
Apr 28, 2022·edited Apr 28, 2022Liked by Techno Fog
Thank you, TechnoFog! you are always the #1 in legal matters! I have some questions:
1) isn't James Baker now the Deputy General Counsel at Twitter? (that's quite interesting considering the recent Takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk)
2) in another article you wrote that Marc Elias was questioned under oath by the Durham Grand Jury (if I'm not wrong) - do you know when that happened? - the date is important, since Marc Elias resigned from Perkins Coie in Aug 2021: one month before Sussmann indictment
3) IIRC, about 24 persons have been interviewed by the Grand Jury. Do you know their names? Or the names of some of them?
4) Has Jake Sullivan been interviewed under oath by the Grand Jury? If yes, do you know when?
They never seem to learn that the TRUTH never rests. Its as true now as when the Nazis tried to hide their crimes by burying their victims only to have the earth heave and move and reveal their genocide. Same thing with the NKVD in the Katyn Forest massacre.
The bottom line?
The US Gruberment has been making life difficult since Woodrow Wilson and has only accelerated it, not reduced it.
So, Christopher Steele is such an explosive witness with such damning evidence that the gov't won't subpoena him because he won't answer their calls? This is all ticky-tack nothing that Durham is churning out to carry water for someone - I assume pressure from Senators to go through motions and keep Trump happy.
The Yota phone and Alfa bank stories both had evidence and deserved to be investigated - whoever brought the evidence forward. Some will claim that the CIA debunked the Alfa story - but Durham reserves judgment and I'm guessing the same people wouldn't trust the CIA about anything else.
I’m very impressed with the way Durham is building this case. It started out deceptively simple with Klinesmith. Now more seriously with Sussman. The panic of the other players is coming into focus as Durham carefully draws them in and explains to the judge why all the evidence he’s requesting to bring in is germane to the case. The judge hasn’t denied him once. All the flailing around of parties that weren’t charged in the case but suddenly want to hide their roles by blocking evidence is blood in the water. If Durham proceeds the way he’s started out, he can blow this case wide open. Let us pray!
TechnoFog, at last I found you! I kept seeing and hearing references to your work thru other sources but I knew I wanted access to your actual product. Much better than having it parsed by a third party. Now all I have to do is drag my tiny Far West Texas bank into this century so I can get a paid subscription. Apparently I have to steer clear of their lunch hours, coffee breaks and weekends!
Odd how Hillarys' tweet is likely to be barred as evidence. Hopefully this is not some indication that she is to be excluded from the investigation. Hopefully it is just some legal technicality regarding the irrelevance of that post. Sussmann and others might be getting prepped to be thrown under that very big bus. Hopefully Durham is not just the "whitewash" guy brought in for a clean up in the meat dept.
Techno-Fog!
I’m beginning to SEE what YOU are doing here and I love it! Three cheers for TechNo-Fog!
I haven’t gotten far into your work and this gem is absolutely making connections in my mind:
“The Special Counsel’s statement reminds us of this letter we discussed from Rodney Joffe’s attorney to the attorneys for Michael Sussmann, stating the Yota phone-related allegations percolated “through various branches of the government and around the private sector after that date, in various forms.”
Let’s just say, I’ll gladly accept an entire pot of Peruvian Coffee.
Thank you! Our son is in law school in Knoxville and I just sent him this article. Looking for you on Truth Social?
The Hildabeast seems destined to NEVER be held accountable.
Thank you, TechnoFog! you are always the #1 in legal matters! I have some questions:
1) isn't James Baker now the Deputy General Counsel at Twitter? (that's quite interesting considering the recent Takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk)
2) in another article you wrote that Marc Elias was questioned under oath by the Durham Grand Jury (if I'm not wrong) - do you know when that happened? - the date is important, since Marc Elias resigned from Perkins Coie in Aug 2021: one month before Sussmann indictment
3) IIRC, about 24 persons have been interviewed by the Grand Jury. Do you know their names? Or the names of some of them?
4) Has Jake Sullivan been interviewed under oath by the Grand Jury? If yes, do you know when?
excellent work as usual...
Thanks, I read this on my show giving links. If you ever want to go on a podcast I'd love to host you for a show.
Once again thanks for you work. I will share on my pages.
They are soooooooooo done :)
They never seem to learn that the TRUTH never rests. Its as true now as when the Nazis tried to hide their crimes by burying their victims only to have the earth heave and move and reveal their genocide. Same thing with the NKVD in the Katyn Forest massacre.
The bottom line?
The US Gruberment has been making life difficult since Woodrow Wilson and has only accelerated it, not reduced it.
So, Christopher Steele is such an explosive witness with such damning evidence that the gov't won't subpoena him because he won't answer their calls? This is all ticky-tack nothing that Durham is churning out to carry water for someone - I assume pressure from Senators to go through motions and keep Trump happy.
The Yota phone and Alfa bank stories both had evidence and deserved to be investigated - whoever brought the evidence forward. Some will claim that the CIA debunked the Alfa story - but Durham reserves judgment and I'm guessing the same people wouldn't trust the CIA about anything else.
Why would the Hillary Alfa Bank tweet be excluded from evidence?
I’m very impressed with the way Durham is building this case. It started out deceptively simple with Klinesmith. Now more seriously with Sussman. The panic of the other players is coming into focus as Durham carefully draws them in and explains to the judge why all the evidence he’s requesting to bring in is germane to the case. The judge hasn’t denied him once. All the flailing around of parties that weren’t charged in the case but suddenly want to hide their roles by blocking evidence is blood in the water. If Durham proceeds the way he’s started out, he can blow this case wide open. Let us pray!
TechnoFog, at last I found you! I kept seeing and hearing references to your work thru other sources but I knew I wanted access to your actual product. Much better than having it parsed by a third party. Now all I have to do is drag my tiny Far West Texas bank into this century so I can get a paid subscription. Apparently I have to steer clear of their lunch hours, coffee breaks and weekends!
It appears Hillary Clinton has dodged a bullet again. (figuratively speaking)
Sadly, Durham is protecting the bureaucrats - dozens upon dozens were involved in the coup and Durham wants only Clinton and a few of her cronies.
Odd how Hillarys' tweet is likely to be barred as evidence. Hopefully this is not some indication that she is to be excluded from the investigation. Hopefully it is just some legal technicality regarding the irrelevance of that post. Sussmann and others might be getting prepped to be thrown under that very big bus. Hopefully Durham is not just the "whitewash" guy brought in for a clean up in the meat dept.