There is a red hot smoking gun right here, that the DOJ advised that disinformation would be criminal in nature. That right there is the smoking gun. THIS IS NOT LISA MONACO, THIS IS (IN THEORY) BILL BARR'S DOJ. Exactly who at the DOJ communicated this, and pursuant to orders from what chain of command?
Gene your analysis is full of BS I have to say you reinforce the typical response from the left based upon emotion and conjecture with no basis of fact. I am sure you will go to the low common dominator and start calling people names as those you think you’re entitled to demean people with no consequences. Here the dirty little secret no one gives a crap what you think.
James Baker was up to his old tricks to the very end. Defrauding the public by "vetting" information that Musk wanted to be released to the public. Once a crook, always a crook, apparently.
Was Elvis Chan one of the FBI agents who used the office set up in Perkins Coie’s D.C. offices for the FBI’s use, the office for which Michael Sussmann was responsible?
It could be even worse. Let's say the tech companies were not already predisposed to block information that would prove damaging to Joe Biden. The FBI could construct a narrative to spook them based on their surveillance of Rudy Giuliani, knowing the laptop was in the wild, soon to be released. They could exert the appropriate amount of bias to get the desired censorship from an unwitting media. Or, worse yet, everyone knew what was happening, but the FBI provided a cover story so they get the outcome they sought and later play dumb. In either case, our leaders are being selected, not elected.
The Twitter files are an overt act as a continuation in furtherance of the original conspiratorial agreement to interfere in POTUS election and destroy Trump Presidency. Commonalities of same cabal of FBI agents involved proving a pattern of conspiracy. This article lays out the legal basis and shows there still a pathway for accountability as the last overt act expire Oct 2025 https://jseaman.substack.com/p/legal-government-reset
Yoel Roth (Twitter) and Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook) have both testified that the FBI warned them about a hack and leak operation just before the Hunter Biden laptop story came out. Neither had a strong motive to lie - yes, they could blame the FBI for their censorship, but Facebook at least already conceded the coverup was a mistake on its part. Chan and the FBI have EVERY REASON to lie. And therefore I conclude that they are the ones lying.
What about Seth Rich?
There is a red hot smoking gun right here, that the DOJ advised that disinformation would be criminal in nature. That right there is the smoking gun. THIS IS NOT LISA MONACO, THIS IS (IN THEORY) BILL BARR'S DOJ. Exactly who at the DOJ communicated this, and pursuant to orders from what chain of command?
Gene your analysis is full of BS I have to say you reinforce the typical response from the left based upon emotion and conjecture with no basis of fact. I am sure you will go to the low common dominator and start calling people names as those you think you’re entitled to demean people with no consequences. Here the dirty little secret no one gives a crap what you think.
It looks like Baker was caught trying to edit what Elon wanted released....
Did I read that right?
Elvis Chan ... I think that guy presided over my wedding in Vegas once after an all night bender
#sethrichmurder
RE: Lead pic
There is absolutely nothing honorable about Christopher Wray.
James Baker was up to his old tricks to the very end. Defrauding the public by "vetting" information that Musk wanted to be released to the public. Once a crook, always a crook, apparently.
Was Elvis Chan one of the FBI agents who used the office set up in Perkins Coie’s D.C. offices for the FBI’s use, the office for which Michael Sussmann was responsible?
Let’s go fbi
It could be even worse. Let's say the tech companies were not already predisposed to block information that would prove damaging to Joe Biden. The FBI could construct a narrative to spook them based on their surveillance of Rudy Giuliani, knowing the laptop was in the wild, soon to be released. They could exert the appropriate amount of bias to get the desired censorship from an unwitting media. Or, worse yet, everyone knew what was happening, but the FBI provided a cover story so they get the outcome they sought and later play dumb. In either case, our leaders are being selected, not elected.
The Twitter files are an overt act as a continuation in furtherance of the original conspiratorial agreement to interfere in POTUS election and destroy Trump Presidency. Commonalities of same cabal of FBI agents involved proving a pattern of conspiracy. This article lays out the legal basis and shows there still a pathway for accountability as the last overt act expire Oct 2025 https://jseaman.substack.com/p/legal-government-reset
If "sowing discord" "in the American online environment" was grounds for removal of content, I have some bad news for the FBI.
Sam Bankman-Fried committed multiple illegal and major crimes – see a good description below:
https://youtu.be/dsPNjskCHr8 -- Michael Saylor Destroys Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX & Alamida Res.
-- What are examples prior sentences for similar, although much smaller scale, crimes ?
-- Why was he invited as a celebrated guest speaker at November DealBook Summit (interviewed by NYT journalist Andrew Sorkin) ?
-- When he will be investigated for his huge and brazen frauds and – by whom (how many victim types and overseeing bodies?
Does anybody know even partial answers? Many thanks !!
Who is Elvis Chan’s CCP handler?
Yoel Roth (Twitter) and Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook) have both testified that the FBI warned them about a hack and leak operation just before the Hunter Biden laptop story came out. Neither had a strong motive to lie - yes, they could blame the FBI for their censorship, but Facebook at least already conceded the coverup was a mistake on its part. Chan and the FBI have EVERY REASON to lie. And therefore I conclude that they are the ones lying.