I wished the prosecution had followed up with Martin and pressed a bit harder ... If the allegations weren’t supported by the data, then what was the data telling you (I.e. deliberate fraud)
This is a sham. There is evidence that Durham should have from "other places " but this is an overthrown government at all levels and will end in total destruction without military executions...maybe with or without the farther the sham goes on...
It seems that the prosecution may have been precluded from the follow-up questioning you suggest. At page 5 of the court's Order filed May 7 on the the parties’ motions in limine, Judge Cooper appears to have restricted the prosecution from addressing the accuracy of the data unless the defense mentions it first:
"The Court will impose certain limitations on the use of this evidence, however. As the
Court previously ruled, unless the defense opens the door for admission by vouching for the data, the government will not be permitted to put on extensive evidence about its accuracy."
Isn’t there an issue with the judge? And now Clintonites on the jury? If true, the trial is nothing more than show trial, with a not guilty verdict. Nothing to see here, move on people. I hope I’m wrong. Thanks for the work you do.
I just got off Brian Cates Substack. There was a mixup in the information. Those jurors are NOT on the grand jury trial. I had thought the same thing as you. A great Patriot explained the mixup that has everyone confused.
I just saw Technofog posted on day 2. Maybe we’ll get some clarification. Can’t read it now. Ugh…so much going on. Tough to keep up with it all.!! Thank goodness for Technofog.!!
Why is obviously irritating is that the FBI let the lie grow in the media. If they had politics injected their work, they need to with a simple release state that no proof is found and debunk. It just festered within Congress and the PR wing of the Dems - the media.
Where it went is not the issue. It is ongoing. This here is a legal procedure in steps. You keep repeating subjects off topic. Look somewhere else for your answers.
We understand Gene who has an agenda. Best to simply ignore the noise. Lets just see where all this goes. A conviction doesn't matter as much as the discovery. As we know, facts count.
The only coup recently was Hillary Clinton's attempt to take down President Trump with lies. She had help from Leftist media and a very compromised Justice Department, most of which quit or were fired because of their lies and political prejudice. Hopefully Durham will spell it out and Techno Fog will make it easy to understand as he always does.
Yep, and right before the eve/even I believe you have called Sussmann "Joffe". The clients, the Hillary campaign and Joffe, are stated correctly. Should be "She elaborated that Sussmann..."?
I always go back to the beginning when all this treachery first started and ask why the FBI didn’t go to Trump to tell him that there is some shenanigans going on. For that reason alone should indicate there was collusion between certain government agents and agents who did not want Trump president.
The tech guy - Manos - is not off the hook. But I'm not sure he was ever on the hook in the first place. "Researcher-2" (David Dagon) has been granted immunity and will testify. Dagon was given immunity to allow Durham to “uncover otherwise-unavailable facts” relating to the Alfa Bank project.
It may be of interest to the commenters that Durham has never lost a case. He builds airtight prosecutions and I’m betting he will drop a good nugget undermining the defense sometime late in the trial.
Love: "Special Counsel Brittain Shaw made clear that this case is “about privilege: the privilege of a well-connected D.C. lawyer with access to the highest levels of the FBI; the privilege of a lawyer who thought that he could lie to the FBI without consequences.” Using that privilege, Sussmann:
“went straight to the FBI general counsel's office, the FBI's top lawyer. He then sat across from that lawyer and lied to him. He told a lie that was designed to achieve a political end, a lie that was designed to inject the FBI into a presidential election.”
Respectfully, while we get buried in minutia, it sounds like the Democrat jury is already bored. Unaddressed elephants in the room:
1. High potential for effectively another OJ jury.
2. It appears Durham has undercharged Sussman, and no charges for Joffe, Georgia Tech researchers (collaborators), etc.
3. "Hopium" might say Durham is still collecting critical evidence; dozens of emails here; 1500 there; and the Sussman case is bringing forth more critical evidence.
4. Is Durham dramatically understaffed?
There's an old saying in football: Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane.
Does Durham not have the chops to actually file Conspiracy charges?
Do I have this pattern correct?
Clinesmith undercharged.
Sussman undercharged.
Joffe not charged.
Georgia Tech researchers not charged.
Conspiracy not charged, though bandied about dozens of times.
What needs to happen for Durham to play like Tarzan?
P.S. Is this televised? Any picture of Team Durham's female attorney (Marsha Clarke 2.0)?
I wished the prosecution had followed up with Martin and pressed a bit harder ... If the allegations weren’t supported by the data, then what was the data telling you (I.e. deliberate fraud)
This is a sham. There is evidence that Durham should have from "other places " but this is an overthrown government at all levels and will end in total destruction without military executions...maybe with or without the farther the sham goes on...
You know what though To Bad for you my record speaks for itself...watch in horror fukstain!!!
It seems that the prosecution may have been precluded from the follow-up questioning you suggest. At page 5 of the court's Order filed May 7 on the the parties’ motions in limine, Judge Cooper appears to have restricted the prosecution from addressing the accuracy of the data unless the defense mentions it first:
"The Court will impose certain limitations on the use of this evidence, however. As the
Court previously ruled, unless the defense opens the door for admission by vouching for the data, the government will not be permitted to put on extensive evidence about its accuracy."
Isn’t there an issue with the judge? And now Clintonites on the jury? If true, the trial is nothing more than show trial, with a not guilty verdict. Nothing to see here, move on people. I hope I’m wrong. Thanks for the work you do.
I just got off Brian Cates Substack. There was a mixup in the information. Those jurors are NOT on the grand jury trial. I had thought the same thing as you. A great Patriot explained the mixup that has everyone confused.
Oh good, I was thinking they would get away with everything.
Thanks for the update Tim, I was truly hoping I was wrong. Any thoughts or information on the filthy corrupt Obama judge overseeing the trial?
I just saw Technofog posted on day 2. Maybe we’ll get some clarification. Can’t read it now. Ugh…so much going on. Tough to keep up with it all.!! Thank goodness for Technofog.!!
Yes. The judge is married to the lawyer to one of the 2 love birds, Lisa page, and Merrick harland presided over that wedding.
Why is obviously irritating is that the FBI let the lie grow in the media. If they had politics injected their work, they need to with a simple release state that no proof is found and debunk. It just festered within Congress and the PR wing of the Dems - the media.
Intent…intentional move by FBI
Where it went is not the issue. It is ongoing. This here is a legal procedure in steps. You keep repeating subjects off topic. Look somewhere else for your answers.
We understand Gene who has an agenda. Best to simply ignore the noise. Lets just see where all this goes. A conviction doesn't matter as much as the discovery. As we know, facts count.
LOL You're becoming unhinged.
"dumb POS". Typical leftest retort --- name calling. Stop it.
Thank you Technofog for breaking this down. Can’t wait for you to break down the afternoon transcript.!!
Thank you!! You're the reason I'm following closely, I know I'll get the truth. Your commentary is great and a trusted source!
The only coup recently was Hillary Clinton's attempt to take down President Trump with lies. She had help from Leftist media and a very compromised Justice Department, most of which quit or were fired because of their lies and political prejudice. Hopefully Durham will spell it out and Techno Fog will make it easy to understand as he always does.
Go start your own sub stack if you've got wisdom to share
Typo in the quote, “to create an October surprise on the eve[] of the presidential election.”
🙏
Why do you think anybody wants to hear your opinion about anything?
Can't wait to NOT read your "newsletters".
You don't belong in polite company.
TDS is treatable, it involves a treatment regime of beatings, but those who have been cured say it is worth it
Thanks for pointing that out. I also caught that. Had to reread that sentence a few times to clarify it.
Yep, and right before the eve/even I believe you have called Sussmann "Joffe". The clients, the Hillary campaign and Joffe, are stated correctly. Should be "She elaborated that Sussmann..."?
🙏
Susseman "duped" the FBI? LOLOLOLOL...they were in on it.
I’ve been looking for an update on the trial…. Thanks so much Techno… you’re hard work and reveals are greatly appreciated by Patriots!
Nice write up Techno! I am very excited for day two also!
I always go back to the beginning when all this treachery first started and ask why the FBI didn’t go to Trump to tell him that there is some shenanigans going on. For that reason alone should indicate there was collusion between certain government agents and agents who did not want Trump president.
Does tech guy get off the hook by invoking the 5th?
The tech guy - Manos - is not off the hook. But I'm not sure he was ever on the hook in the first place. "Researcher-2" (David Dagon) has been granted immunity and will testify. Dagon was given immunity to allow Durham to “uncover otherwise-unavailable facts” relating to the Alfa Bank project.
Lol ok gene
Don't hold your breath.
What's your opinion of the Steele Dossier and Joe Biden't mental health?
You're either uninformed or your opinion is too heavily influenced by the throughly corrupt left wing media.
someone's living under a rock.
the "tech guy" has been granted immunity
Gotcha.!! Thank you for the clarification.!!
It may be of interest to the commenters that Durham has never lost a case. He builds airtight prosecutions and I’m betting he will drop a good nugget undermining the defense sometime late in the trial.
Edge. Of. My. Seat.
Rock on, Techno Fog.
Rock on!
Love: "Special Counsel Brittain Shaw made clear that this case is “about privilege: the privilege of a well-connected D.C. lawyer with access to the highest levels of the FBI; the privilege of a lawyer who thought that he could lie to the FBI without consequences.” Using that privilege, Sussmann:
“went straight to the FBI general counsel's office, the FBI's top lawyer. He then sat across from that lawyer and lied to him. He told a lie that was designed to achieve a political end, a lie that was designed to inject the FBI into a presidential election.”
Respectfully, while we get buried in minutia, it sounds like the Democrat jury is already bored. Unaddressed elephants in the room:
1. High potential for effectively another OJ jury.
2. It appears Durham has undercharged Sussman, and no charges for Joffe, Georgia Tech researchers (collaborators), etc.
3. "Hopium" might say Durham is still collecting critical evidence; dozens of emails here; 1500 there; and the Sussman case is bringing forth more critical evidence.
4. Is Durham dramatically understaffed?
There's an old saying in football: Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane.
Does Durham not have the chops to actually file Conspiracy charges?
Do I have this pattern correct?
Clinesmith undercharged.
Sussman undercharged.
Joffe not charged.
Georgia Tech researchers not charged.
Conspiracy not charged, though bandied about dozens of times.
What needs to happen for Durham to play like Tarzan?
P.S. Is this televised? Any picture of Team Durham's female attorney (Marsha Clarke 2.0)?
Because using legal manuavering in a Godamn naked overthrow is always effective! Younknow.
Get a new talking point. You sound like a broken record.
HAHAHAHA...you "think". That's hysterical. Drink some more collusion Koolayd clown