Flying under the radar is an admission made by the FDA regarding the durability of the one COVID-19 vaccine – the Pfizer vaccine (under the name COMIRNATY) – that was officially “approved”: “data is not yet available to inform about the duration of protection that the vaccine will provide.”
This stands in contrast to CDC admissions, in support of their push for a booster shot, that “vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infections is decreasing over time.”
Anyway, what a statement in light of the history of the Pfizer vaccine - and the publicly available data.
For background, let’s review some history. The Pfizer vaccine’s IND (New Drug Application) was filed in April 2020, after which it was granted its Fast Track Designation in July 2020. On December 11, 2020, the FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer vaccine for persons age 16 and up. The Pfizer vaccine (COMIRNATY) was “approved” by the FDA on August 23, 2021.
Since the summer of 2020, Pfizer has been studying its vaccine on tens of thousands of individuals. The reliability of these studies were diminished greatly in December 2020, when the Pfizer study participants were “unblinded” and offered the Pfizer vaccine if they initially received the placebo.
From the time of the Pfizer vaccine EUA until the FDA gave its “approval” of the Pfizer vaccine, hundreds of millions of Pfizer vaccines had been administered. As of September 26, 2021, approximately 223 million people had received the Pfizer vaccine.
And as we previously discussed, the FDA’s approval of COMIRNATY was suspicious for a number of reasons, including because the COMIRNATY fact sheet admits “The duration of protection against COVID-19 is currently unknown.”
We had doubts about the truthfulness of that statement back in August, noting that Pfizer was relying on data “through March 13, 2021.” We observed that the data was five months old, asked if the FDA was using outdated information to support its COMIRNATY approval, and noted that more recent evidence pointed to vaccine effectiveness diminishing over time.
On that point, with studies that have been ongoing since the summer of 2020, and hundreds of millions of vaccines being administered, and the CDC concessions of duration issues, how is it possible for the FDA to conclude “data is not yet available to inform about the duration of protection that the vaccine will provide”?
If it sounds like they’re hiding something – it’s because they are.
The CDC has issued a press release (attributable to CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, NIH Director Francis Collins, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, among others) “based on a thorough review of the evidence” that:
“We are prepared to offer booster shots [Pfizer and Moderna] for all Americans beginning the week of September 20 and starting 8 months after an individual’s second dose.”
This leads us to an important question:
If the data on the duration of the Pfizer vaccine is “not yet available,” then how can the CDC and Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci recommend the Pfizer booster shot after 8 months?
While the CDC has provided some information on the topic, there is certainly more they aren’t telling us.
Are you all aware that there is a patent registered with the US Patent for the Covid-sars-2, if this was a natural virus which they say it was, why do they have a patent on it? And if it was made in a lab why do they have a patent on it? Both patents are illegal. The patents are registered to the CDC, which I find to be suspicious in its self. This is a weapon to be used against the people of the world. Let’s face it, the virus didn’t kill (legitimately) as many people as they wanted, so now they are depending on people being gullible and getting the vaccine, which they are hoping takes care of the rest. They realize there will be people that will not get it, and they will try to make our lives a living hell, with their mandates on large companies, inability to move about with out having had the vaccine. But we can beat them at this little cat and mouse game if we stand our ground and not let the government that “works” for us, “dictate” what we do. I personally am not going down without a fight and neither are members of my family that are awake.
It should be noted that the NIH and CDC are now under the direct control of politicians and their responses have long been tailored to fit whatever narrative the gov't is currently pushing. Medical "science" has for decades been compromised by "grants" and gov't policies to the point where they can be seriously argued they to present a clear and present danger to many segments of the American public.
Pregnant woman, young children and individuals who have recovered from the virus as well as those who usually recover because of youth, good health or just natural immunity are ALL being lumped together and in too many cases being forced by mandates and draconian policies to take a medication they probably don't need or might even harm them is some way.
How and reasonable medical doctor could take part in this medical malpractice is astounding. The AMA and other organizations are mute and offer no reasoned advice to their members or the public. Politicians and many many non-medically trained individuals have usurped the entire medical communities mandate and run roughshod over best practices and individual care. This is common in Communist countries and other autocratic States. Whoever thought we would be dealing with this in America in the year 2021??
Might be time to sue these people in a Court of Law to determine the basis for their masks, lockdowns and forced vaccinations. Problem is even our Courts seem driven by hysteria and group think on a huge scale. The price individuals are paying for taking their doctors advice over some gov't bureaucrat or news outlet is pretty steep. Had the gov't instituted one tenth the control over abortion that they have assured over EVERY Americans personal medical decisions there would be hell to pay. Vote them out or continue down this path to the bottom of the abyss where you are completely owned and operated by the US Government.