The Reactionary

Share this post

The New York Times’ attack on Special Counsel Durham

technofog.substack.com

The New York Times’ attack on Special Counsel Durham

Revisionist History from Collusion Perpetrators

Techno Fog
Jan 30
152
62
Share this post

The New York Times’ attack on Special Counsel Durham

technofog.substack.com


It’s said that Special Counsel John Durham is still writing, if not finishing up, his report detailing the findings of his multi-year investigation.

As always, the leaks – and the hits – are preceding the report.

There’s an obvious and tired trick from the media when it comes to the discovery of abuses by federal officials during the Russiagate scandal, which stretched from before the opening of Crossfire Hurricane to the conclusion of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. I’m sure you’ve seen it. The formula is quite simple: downplay or ignore what has been uncovered and focus on what hasn’t been found.

We’ve seen it in The Washington Post from their dim-witted national columnist Philip Bump, whose previous writings disclosed a utter lack of knowledge about FISA warrants.

And now we see it from Charlie Savage, Adam Goldman, and Katie Benner at The New York Times.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Reactionary to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2023 Techno Fog
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing